The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The neuronal architecture of the inferior colliculus in the cat: Defining the functional anatomy of the auditory midbrain
Abstract
This study defines anatomical subdivisions in Golgi‐impregnated material from the inferior colliculus of the cat. The findings demonstrate that the inferior colliculus consists of a mosaic of morphologically distinct parts of neuropil. Each part is also characterized by a unique set of neuronal types. Each part of the inferior colliculus can be defined as tectal or tegmental on the basis of the fundamental pattern of dendritic branching. The main subdivisions of the auditory tectum are the central nucleus, the cortex, and the paracentral nuclei. The central nucleus is distinguished by its laminated neuropil composed of neurons with disc‐shaped dendritic fields oriented in parallel arrays with the lemniscal axons. In contrast, the cortex is identified by its broad layers of loosely woven neuropil, which are orthogonal to those in the central nucleus and lack neurons with disc‐shaped dendritic fields. The paracentral nuclei, so called because of their scattered arrangement around the central nucleus, are the commissural, dorsomedial, rostral pole, lateral, and ventrolateral nuclei. The main subdivisions of the auditory tegmentum are the pericollicular areas, the nucleus of the brachium of the inferior colliculus, and the sagulum. The pericollicular areas are intercollicular or subcollicular and separate the tectal division from the superior colliculus, central gray, and remaining portions of the tegmentum. The afferent projections to each tectal and tegmental subdivision, as observed in silver‐degeneration experiments, distinguish the parcellations based on the Golgi findings. Subdivisions containing tectal cell types receive afferents predominantly from the auditory pathways, in contrast to subdivisions with tegmental cell types, which receive inputs from a wide variety of sources. This suggests a correlation between neuronal types and the nature of their inputs. This analysis of the subdivisions of the inferior colliculus differs from previous studies, especially those relying on Nissl stains. It is likely that subdivisions distinguished by the pattern of the neuropil differ functionally, since the structural components identified in the Golgi‐impregnated material are essential parts of the synaptic organization of the auditory midbrain. Future physiological studies should benefit from approaches in which the cell types serve as the focus for the analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neural Processing of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds
JORIS, P. X., SCHREINER, C. E., & REES, A. (2004) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00029.2003 · Cited by 938
Linke, R. (1999) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00422.x · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Morest, D. K., & Oliver, D. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-01-10
- Volume
- 222
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-236
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2002491136
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The neuronal architecture of the inferior colliculus in the cat: Defining the functional anatomy of the auditory midbrain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902220206
- The paper
- Morest, D. K., & Oliver, D. L. (1984). The neuronal architecture of the inferior colliculus in the cat: Defining the functional anatomy of the auditory midbrain. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902220206
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.