Light and electron microscopic studies of the distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 in rat brain: a difference between dendritic and axonal cytoskeletons
Abstract
A specific antiserum was used to ascertain the distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) in the rat brain at the light and electron microscope levels. Light microscopy showed MAP2 to be present only in neurons, and only in the dendrites and the perikaryon of each cell. This same polarized distribution pattern was found in the Purkinje, Golgi, basket, stellate, and granule cells of the cerebellum, and also in neurons of the hippocampus, the olfactory bulb, and the midbrain. While labelling of the dendritic arborization was extensive and intense, MAP2 density tended to decrease in the proximal dendritic trunk. Particularly in large neurons (e.g., Purkinje, Golgi, and pyramidal cells), staining was reproducibly weaker in the cell body than in the main dendrites. Dendritic contours generally appeared smooth, without any evidence of staining of dendritic spines. An electron microscope examination of the cerebellum confirmed the presence of MAP2 reactivity in neurons and its absence from axons and non-neuronal cells. MAP2 in dendrites was associated with microtubules, while MAP2 in neuronal perikarya was associated with polyribosomes. There was no evidence of specific staining in dendritic spines and in postsynaptic densities. MAP2 is a novel dendritic marker and labels part of a specific dendritic cytoskeleton, different from that in axons and non-neuronal cells.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MAP2 localizes predominantly to the cell body and dendrites.
“MAP2 is one of microtubule (MT) associated proteins (MAPs) and has been known to localize predominantly to the cell body and dendrites (1, 2).”
From Active transport by cytoplasmic dynein sustains dendritic MAP2 localization in developing neurons (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 48 · Cited by 421
- Authors
- Bernhardt, R., & Matus, A.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-06-20
- Volume
- 226
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-221
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2053121988
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- MAP2, dendritic cytoskeleton, axonal cytoskeleton, dendrites, neurons, cerebellum, Purkinje cells, hippocampus, dendritic spines, postsynaptic density, polysomes, microtubules, rat brain
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Axons, Brain, Cerebellum, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Mesencephalon, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Neurons, Olfactory Bulb, Polyribosomes, Proteins, Purkinje Cells, Synapses, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review