Cited by 421Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Light and electron microscopic studies of the distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 in rat brain: a difference between dendritic and axonal cytoskeletons

Bernhardt, R., Matus, A.·1984·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

A specific antiserum was used to ascertain the distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 (MAP2) in the rat brain at the light and electron microscope levels. Light microscopy showed MAP2 to be present only in neurons, and only in the dendrites and the perikaryon of each cell. This same polarized distribution pattern was found in the Purkinje, Golgi, basket, stellate, and granule cells of the cerebellum, and also in neurons of the hippocampus, the olfactory bulb, and the midbrain. While labelling of the dendritic arborization was extensive and intense, MAP2 density tended to decrease in the proximal dendritic trunk. Particularly in large neurons (e.g., Purkinje, Golgi, and pyramidal cells), staining was reproducibly weaker in the cell body than in the main dendrites. Dendritic contours generally appeared smooth, without any evidence of staining of dendritic spines. An electron microscope examination of the cerebellum confirmed the presence of MAP2 reactivity in neurons and its absence from axons and non-neuronal cells. MAP2 in dendrites was associated with microtubules, while MAP2 in neuronal perikarya was associated with polyribosomes. There was no evidence of specific staining in dendritic spines and in postsynaptic densities. MAP2 is a novel dendritic marker and labels part of a specific dendritic cytoskeleton, different from that in axons and non-neuronal cells.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902260205

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 421

Authors
Bernhardt, R., & Matus, A.
Affiliations
Friedrich Miescher Institute (CH)
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-06-20
Volume
226
Issue
2
Pages
203-221
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2053121988
Cited by
421
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
MAP2, dendritic cytoskeleton, axonal cytoskeleton, dendrites, neurons, cerebellum, Purkinje cells, hippocampus, dendritic spines, postsynaptic density, polysomes, microtubules, rat brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Brain, Cerebellum, Dendrites, Hippocampus, Mesencephalon, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Microtubules, Neurons, Olfactory Bulb, Polyribosomes, Proteins, Purkinje Cells, Synapses, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review