Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A laminar analysis of the number of round‐asymmetrical and flat‐symmetrical synapses on spines, dendritic trunks, and cell bodies in area 17 of the cat

Beaulieu, Clermont, Colonnier, Marc·1985·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The number of synapses per unit volume of tissue (N v) has been estimated in individual laminae of the binocular and monocular regions of area 17 in six adult cats by using a method of size‐frequency distribution. Separate estimates were obtained for RA synapses (containing round vesicles associated with asymmetric membrane differentiations) and for FS synapses (containing flat vesicles associated with symmetric membrane differentiations). For the total cortical thickness, the N v of all synapses is not statistically different between binocular (286 million per mml 3) and monocular (281 million) regions, nor is it different between the two regions for any of the laminae. Eighty‐four percent of synapses are of the RA type. of those, 79% are found on dendritic spines, 21% on dendritic trunks, 0.1% on somata. FS synapses represent 16% of the total, with 31% of them on spines, 62% on dendritic trunks, and 7% on somata. The ratio of RA to FS synapses is kept relatively constant throughout the layers. A two‐way analysis of variance shows no difference in the N v of either RA or FS synapses in the two regions nor in the N v of RA synapses between cats. It does, however, clearly demonstrate (p < 0.001) interindividual differences for FS synapses. These variations between individual cats may be due to differences in age, breed, or environmental factors. In contrast to the relative uniformity of the N v of synapses between regions, the number of each type under 1 mm 2 of cortical surface is 33% higher in the binocular region. This is due mainly to the greater thickness of the binocular region.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.902310206

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Metadata

Authors
Beaulieu, C., & Colonnier, M.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-01-08
Volume
231
Issue
2
Pages
180-189
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2058582588
Cited by
239
References
9
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A laminar analysis of the number of round‐asymmetrical and flat‐symmetrical synapses on spines, dendritic trunks, and cell bodies in area 17 of the cat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.902310206
The paper
Beaulieu, C., & Colonnier, M. (1985). A laminar analysis of the number of round‐asymmetrical and flat‐symmetrical synapses on spines, dendritic trunks, and cell bodies in area 17 of the cat. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.902310206

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.