The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the rat visual cortex. I. Correlation among cell morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and axon targets
Abstract
Previous work has established two structure/function correlations for pyramidal neurons of layer 5 of the primary visual cortex of the rat. First, cells projecting to the superior colliculus have thick apical dendrites with a florid terminal arborization in layer 1, whereas those projecting to the visual cortex of the opposite hemisphere have thinner apical dendrites that terminate below layer 1, without a terminal tuft (e.g., Hallman et al.: J Comp Neurol 272:149, '90). Second, intracellular recording combined with dye injection has revealed two classes of cells: the first has a thick, tufted apical dendrite and fires a distinctive initial burst of two or more impulses, of virtually fixed, short interspike interval, in response to current injection; and the other, with a slender apical dendrite lacking a terminal tuft, tends to have a longer membrane time constant and higher input resistance, and does not fire characteristic bursts (e.g., Larkman and Mason: J Neurosci 10:1407, '90). The present study combined intracellular recording in isolated slices of rat visual cortex and injection of carboxyfluorescein, to reveal soma‐dendritic morphology, with prior injection of rhodamine‐conjugated microspheres into the superior colliculus or contralateral visual cortex to label neurons according to the target of the superior colliculus or contralateral visual cortex to label neurons according to the target of their axons. This permitted a complete correlation of morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and identity of the projection target for individual pyramidal cells. Neurons retrogradely labeled from the opposite visual cortex were found in all layers except layer 1 while those labeled from the superior colliculus lay exclusively in layer 5. Within layer 5 interhemispheric cells were more concentrated in the lower half of the layer but extensively overlapped the distribution of corticotectal cells. Every cell studied that projected to the superior colliculus was of the bursting type and had a thick apical dendrite with a terminal tuft. Every cell in this study projecting to the opposite visual cortex was a “nonburster” and had a slender apical dendrite with fewer oblique branches that ended without a terminal tuft, usually in the upper part of layer 2/3. Interhemispheric cells also had rounder, less conical somata and generally had fewer basal dendrites than corticotectal neurons. Many cells with the physiological and morphological characteristics of interhemispheric cells were not back‐labeled from the opposite visual cortex, implying that pyramidal cells of this type can have other projection targets (e.g., other cortical sites in the ipsilateral hemisphere). On the other hand, few cells of the “thick/tufted,” bursting class were found that were not back‐labeled from the superior colliculus, implying that the majority of such cells project to that target. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, Z., & McCormick, D. (1993) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.13-05-02199.1993 · Cited by 307
An intracellular study of neuronal organization in the visual cortex
Toyama, K., Matsunami, K., Ohno, T., & Tokashiki, S. (1974) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00234257 · Cited by 231
Cited by
Pyramidal neurons: dendritic structure and synaptic integration
Spruston, N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2286 · Cited by 1,688
Markram, H., Lübke, J., Frotscher, M., Roth, A., & Sakmann, B. (1997) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1997.sp022031 · Cited by 960
Self-citationExperience-dependent and cell-type-specific spine growth in the neocortex
Holtmaat, A., Wilbrecht, L., Knott, G. W., Welker, E., & Svoboda, K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04783 · Cited by 631
Traub, R. D., Contreras, D., Cunningham, M. O., Murray, H., LeBeau, F. E. N., Roopun, A., Bibbig, A., Wilent, W. B., Higley, M. J., & Whittington, M. A. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00983.2004 · Cited by 466
Nowak, L. G., Azouz, R., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., Gray, C. M., & McCormick, D. A. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00580.2002 · Cited by 441
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasper, E. M., Larkman, A. U., Lübke, J., & Blakemore, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-01-22
- Volume
- 339
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-474
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2037257325
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the rat visual cortex. I. Correlation among cell morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and axon targets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903390402
- The paper
- Kasper, E. M., Larkman, A. U., Lübke, J., & Blakemore, C. (1994). Pyramidal neurons in layer 5 of the rat visual cortex. I. Correlation among cell morphology, intrinsic electrophysiological properties, and axon targets. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903390402
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.