Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Octopamine‐like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee

Kreissl, Sabine, Eichmüller, Stefan, Bicker, Gerd, Rapus, Jürgen, Eckert, Manfred·1994·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

The organization of putative octopaminergic pathways in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee was investigated with a well‐defined polyclonal antiserum against octopamine. Five prominent groups of just over 100 immunoreactive (IR) somata were found in the cerebral ganglion: Neurosecretory cells in the pars intercerebralis innervating the corpora cardiaca via NCC I, one cluster mediodorsal to the antennal lobe, one scattered on both sides of the midline of the protocerebrum, one between the lateral protocerebral lobes and the dorsal lobes, and a single soma on either side of the central body. With the exception of the pedunculi and β‐lobes of the mushroom bodies, varicose immunoreactive fibers penetrate all parts of the cerebral ganglion. Strong labelling was found in the central complex and the protocerebral bridge. Fine networks of labelled processes invade the antennal lobes, the calyces and a small part of the α‐lobes of the mushroom bodies, the protocerebrum, and all three optic ganglia. In the subesophageal ganglion, one labelled cell body was found in the lateral soma layer of the mandibular segment. Each of the three neuromeres contains a group of six to ten somata in the ventral median parts. Most of the ventral median cells send their neurites dorsally through the midline tracts, whereas the neurites of a few cells follow the ventral cell body neurite tracts. Octopamine‐IR was demonstrated in all neuropils that contain pathways for proboscis extension learning in honeybees. Because octopaminergic mechanisms seem to be involved in the behavioral plasticity of the proboscis extension reflex, our study provides anatomical data on the neurochemical organization of an appetitive learning paradigm. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903480408

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Kreissl, S., Eichmüller, S., Bicker, G., Rapus, J., & Eckert, M.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1994-10-22
Volume
348
Issue
4
Pages
583-595
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W1976575629
Cited by
190
References
0
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Octopamine‐like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903480408
The paper
Kreissl, S., Eichmüller, S., Bicker, G., Rapus, J., & Eckert, M. (1994). Octopamine‐like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903480408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.