The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Octopamine‐like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee
Abstract
The organization of putative octopaminergic pathways in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee was investigated with a well‐defined polyclonal antiserum against octopamine. Five prominent groups of just over 100 immunoreactive (IR) somata were found in the cerebral ganglion: Neurosecretory cells in the pars intercerebralis innervating the corpora cardiaca via NCC I, one cluster mediodorsal to the antennal lobe, one scattered on both sides of the midline of the protocerebrum, one between the lateral protocerebral lobes and the dorsal lobes, and a single soma on either side of the central body. With the exception of the pedunculi and β‐lobes of the mushroom bodies, varicose immunoreactive fibers penetrate all parts of the cerebral ganglion. Strong labelling was found in the central complex and the protocerebral bridge. Fine networks of labelled processes invade the antennal lobes, the calyces and a small part of the α‐lobes of the mushroom bodies, the protocerebrum, and all three optic ganglia. In the subesophageal ganglion, one labelled cell body was found in the lateral soma layer of the mandibular segment. Each of the three neuromeres contains a group of six to ten somata in the ventral median parts. Most of the ventral median cells send their neurites dorsally through the midline tracts, whereas the neurites of a few cells follow the ventral cell body neurite tracts. Octopamine‐IR was demonstrated in all neuropils that contain pathways for proboscis extension learning in honeybees. Because octopaminergic mechanisms seem to be involved in the behavioral plasticity of the proboscis extension reflex, our study provides anatomical data on the neurochemical organization of an appetitive learning paradigm. © 1994 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models
Heisenberg, M. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1074 · Cited by 1,286
Learning and memory in the honeybee
Hammer, M., & Menzel, R. (1995) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.15-03-01617.1995 · Cited by 733
Hammer, M., & Menzel, R. (1998) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.5.1.146 · Cited by 536
Behavioral and neural analysis of associative learning in the honeybee: a taste from the magic well
Giurfa, M. (2007) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/s00359-007-0235-9 · Cited by 485
Blenau, W., & Baumann, A. (2001) · Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology · doi:10.1002/arch.1055 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreissl, S., Eichmüller, S., Bicker, G., Rapus, J., & Eckert, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-10-22
- Volume
- 348
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-595
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W1976575629
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Octopamine‐like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903480408
- The paper
- Kreissl, S., Eichmüller, S., Bicker, G., Rapus, J., & Eckert, M. (1994). Octopamine‐like immunoreactivity in the brain and subesophageal ganglion of the honeybee. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903480408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.