The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long‐term sensory hyperinnervation following neonatal skin wounds
Abstract
Skin innervation during wound healing was investigated using immunocytochemical staining with the panneuronal marker antiprotein gene product (PGP) 9.5, which labels the entire innervation of the skin throughout development and in the adult. Full‐thickness skin wounds in the hairy skin of the foot in neonatal rats result in pronounced hyperinnervation of the tissue that persists long after the wound has healed (at least 12 weeks). Quantification of this hyperinnervation by image analysis indicates that slcoin innervation density in the wounded area can increase up to 300%. The effect is greatest when wounds are performed at postnatal day (P) 0 or 7, declining when performed at P14 and P21 to resemble the weaker and transient effect in the adult. Staining with selective markers for different neuronal populations innervating skin (monoclonal anti‐RT97 staining the myelinated axons of large light sensory ganglion cells; anticalcitonin gene‐related peptide staining unmyelinated C axons, thinly myelinated Aδ axons, and a subpopulation of large A fibres) reveal that both A‐ and C‐fibre sensory axons contribute to this response. Destruction of the majority of the C‐fibre population with neonatal capsaicin pretreatment, which leaves large, A fibres intact, significantly reduces the hyperinnervation response at 14 days, confirming a major contribution from both A and C‐fibres. Sympathetic axons, stained with anti‐tyrosine hydroxylase, do not sprout into the wounded area. Furthermore, pretreatment of neonates with 6–hydroxydopamine, which destroys the sympathetic innervation, does not significantly reduce the overall sprouting response, as identified by anti‐PGP9. 5 staining. Behavioural sensory testing revealed a 50% drop in the mechanical threshold in the wounded area after 3 weeks. These remarkably long‐term and specific effects on sensory terminal axons following neonatal skin wounding indicate the plasticity of cutaneous innervation density following alterations in the target tissue at a critical stage of development. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The development of nociceptive circuits
Fitzgerald, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1701 · Cited by 778
Self-citationLong-Term Behavioral Effects of Repetitive Pain in Neonatal Rat Pups
Anand, K. J. S., Coskun, V, Thrivikraman, K. V., Nemeroff, C. B., & Plotsky, P. M. (1999) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00338-2 · Cited by 432
Neural Regulation of Hematopoiesis, Inflammation, and Cancer
Hanoun, M., Maryanovich, M., Arnal-Estapé, A., & Frenette, P. S. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.01.026 · Cited by 265
Role of peripheral nerve fibres in acute and chronic inflammation in arthritis
Pongratz, G., & Straub, R. H. (2013) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2012.181 · Cited by 149
Smith, P., & Liu, M. (2002) · Cell and Tissue Research · doi:10.1007/s00441-001-0477-8 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, M. L., & Fitzgerald, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-08-07
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 487-498
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2011835949
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long‐term sensory hyperinnervation following neonatal skin wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cne.903580403
- The paper
- Reynolds, M. L., & Fitzgerald, M. (1995). Long‐term sensory hyperinnervation following neonatal skin wounds. Journal of Comparative Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.903580403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.