Intrinsic circuit organization of the major layers and sublayers of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey
Abstract
Intrinsic connections are likely to play important roles in cognitive information processing in the prefrontal association cortex. To gain insight into the organization of these circuits, intracortical connections of major laminar and sublaminar divisions were retrogradely labeled in Walker's area 9 and 46 in rhesus monkeys by using cholera toxin (B-subunit) conjugated to colloidal gold. Microinjections placed within particular cortical laminae produced unique patterns of retrograde labeling. Injections in layers II/III yielded labeling which was laterally widespread (2-7 mm) in supragranular layers, and more narrowly focused, i.e., conforming to a column, in layers IV-VI. In contrast, local circuits associated with layers IV and Vb displayed a regular, cylindrical organization, whereas intrinsic connections of layer Va were laterally extensive (3-5 mm) in layers III and Va. Finally, injections in layer VI gave rise to a narrow column of cell labeling traversing all layers, augmented by laterally extensive labeling (approximately 7 mm) in layer VI. The intrinsic connections of the prefrontal cortex were arrayed within mediolaterally elongated stripes which were often distributed asymmetrically in either the medial or lateral direction. In addition, labeled cells within these mediolaterally oriented fields were frequently grouped within discrete clusters or narrow bands. The intrinsic connections identified in this study differ from the local circuits of corresponding layers r…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Deep layer III contains extensive horizontal connections needed for recurrent excitation.
“With Mary Kritzer, she showed that deep layer III contains the extensive horizontal connections needed for extensive recurrent excitation (Kritzer & Goldman-Rakic, 1995).”
From Guanfacine’s mechanism of action in treating prefrontal cortical disorders: Successful translation across species (2020) · cites this paper as Kritzer & Goldman-Rakic, 1995
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 63 · Cited by 300
- Authors
- Kritzer, M. F., & Goldman‐Rakic, P. S.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kritzer, M. F.
- ORCID
- Kritzer, M. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-08-14
- Volume
- 359
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-143
- ISSN
- 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-9861
- OpenAlex
- W2071137742
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (NH38546)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH 44866, P50MH044866)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, intrinsic connections, cortical laminar organization, sublayer, area 46, rhesus monkeys, retrograde tracing, cholera toxin B subunit, intracortical circuits, supragranular layers, layer 6
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cholera Toxin, Macaca mulatta, Neural Pathways, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Gold Colloid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review