Cited by 300Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeural dynamics and brain function

Intrinsic circuit organization of the major layers and sublayers of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey

Kritzer, M. F., Goldman‐Rakic, P. S.·1995·Journal of Comparative Neurology

Abstract

Intrinsic connections are likely to play important roles in cognitive information processing in the prefrontal association cortex. To gain insight into the organization of these circuits, intracortical connections of major laminar and sublaminar divisions were retrogradely labeled in Walker's area 9 and 46 in rhesus monkeys by using cholera toxin (B-subunit) conjugated to colloidal gold. Microinjections placed within particular cortical laminae produced unique patterns of retrograde labeling. Injections in layers II/III yielded labeling which was laterally widespread (2-7 mm) in supragranular layers, and more narrowly focused, i.e., conforming to a column, in layers IV-VI. In contrast, local circuits associated with layers IV and Vb displayed a regular, cylindrical organization, whereas intrinsic connections of layer Va were laterally extensive (3-5 mm) in layers III and Va. Finally, injections in layer VI gave rise to a narrow column of cell labeling traversing all layers, augmented by laterally extensive labeling (approximately 7 mm) in layer VI. The intrinsic connections of the prefrontal cortex were arrayed within mediolaterally elongated stripes which were often distributed asymmetrically in either the medial or lateral direction. In addition, labeled cells within these mediolaterally oriented fields were frequently grouped within discrete clusters or narrow bands. The intrinsic connections identified in this study differ from the local circuits of corresponding layers r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cne.903590109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 63 · Cited by 300

Authors
Kritzer, M. F., & Goldman‐Rakic, P. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Kritzer, M. F.
Venue
Journal of Comparative Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-08-14
Volume
359
Issue
1
Pages
131-143
ISSN
  • 0021-9967 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-9861
OpenAlex
W2071137742
Cited by
300
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Comparative Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NH38546)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 44866, P50MH044866)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, intrinsic connections, cortical laminar organization, sublayer, area 46, rhesus monkeys, retrograde tracing, cholera toxin B subunit, intracortical circuits, supragranular layers, layer 6
MeSH terms
Animals, Cholera Toxin, Macaca mulatta, Neural Pathways, Sensitivity and Specificity, Prefrontal Cortex, Pyramidal Cells, Gold Colloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review