The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new association fiber tract in the cerebrum with remarks on the fiber tract dissection method of studying the brain.
Open accessAbstract
I n April and May, 190s) while as an undergraduate pursuing the elective course in advanced anatomy in the Harvard Medical School under Professor Dwight, I was repeatedly and agreeably surprised with the ease and accuracy with which many of the fiber tracts of the brain, the nuclei, and the deep origins of some of the nerves could be dissected by methods slightiy modified from those employed in studying other parts of the body.Through the kindness of Professor Dwight and Dr. Warren, I was allowed to use a large number of brains for dissection, in the course of which new and impressive pictures of well-known structures were continually occurring.With such novelty and distinctness did these stand out that one not familiar with the original works of the early anatomists would almost be convinced that a new method of attacking the difficult problems of brain anatomy had been discovered.The attempt to follow fiber tracts by dissection seems to be the most natural method for investigation of the larger structures in the brain, and one that would be first thought of.So it is not surprising to learn that before the advent of the microscope, among the different methods of brain study attempted by our predecessors, fiber-tract dissection had a place, and many of the larger structures were displayed with considerable skill.With the introduction of the microscope, however, this method became neglected.and one cannot see in the text-books of to-day a single
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“there have been some inconsistencies surrounding the IFOF’s anatomical course and terminations”
From Cortical Terminations of the Inferior Fronto-Occipital and Uncinate Fasciculi: Anatomical Stem-Based Virtual Dissection (2016) · cites this paper as Curran, 1909
In the citing paper
“However, they are clearly distinct at the level of the stem and can be separated by a notable cleavage line (Curran, 1909; Kier et al., 2004; Martino et al., 2010; Sarubbo et al., 2013).”
From Cortical Terminations of the Inferior Fronto-Occipital and Uncinate Fasciculi: Anatomical Stem-Based Virtual Dissection (2016) · cites this paper as Curran, 1909
In the citing paper
“There is converging evidence for the existence of fronto-parietal connections for the IFOF from post-mortem (Curran, 1909; Martino et al., 2010) and tractography studies (Mori et al., 2005; Caverzasi et al., 2014).”
From Cortical Terminations of the Inferior Fronto-Occipital and Uncinate Fasciculi: Anatomical Stem-Based Virtual Dissection (2016) · cites this paper as Curran, 1909
In the citing paper
“This corresponds to one of the earliest descriptions of the IFOF by Curran (1909)”
From Cortical Terminations of the Inferior Fronto-Occipital and Uncinate Fasciculi: Anatomical Stem-Based Virtual Dissection (2016) · cites this paper as Curran, 1909
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–117 of 117
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.003.0029
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.003.0009
Wilczynski, W., & Brosnan, S. F. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108671187.007
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.003.0011
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.003.0010
(2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-405514-8.50007-4
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.002.0005
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.002.0004
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.002.0023
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.002.0006
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.002.0024
Schmahmann, J. D., & Pandya, D. Ν. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195104233.002.0003
Weiss, A., & Weiss, F. (2023) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1002619
Metadata
- Authors
- Curran, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Curran, E. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1909-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 645-656
- ISSN
- 0092-7015 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-7149
- OpenAlex
- W2050491891
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- zenodo.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anatomy › Classical Anatomy and Histology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
- Keywords
- cerebrum, neuroanatomy, white matter tracts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
