Cited by 13Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionCO2 Reduction Techniques and CatalystsAdvanced battery technologies research

Carbon Nanofibers Encapsulated Nickel‐Molybdenum Nanoparticles as Hydrogen Evolution Catalysts for Aqueous Zn−CO2 System

Asokan, Arunchander, Lim, Chaehyun, Kim, Jeongwon, Kwon, Ohhun, Lee, Hansol, Joo, Sangwook, Jeong, Hu Young, Kim, Guntae·2020·ChemNanoMat

Abstract

Carbon capture, utilization and storage techniques have been studied extensively to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide. However, CO2 conversion technologies are not widely proposed due to sluggish conversion rate, high energy consumption and need for precious metals as catalysts. Therefore, novel metal‐CO2 electrochemical cell has been proposed to utilize CO2 to produce electricity and H2 gas continuously. Electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction under neutral condition has demanded the overall device performance. Herein, we have developed non‐precious NiMo‐carbon nanofiber‐based catalyst with unique matchstick‐like morphology using low temperature CVD technique and demonstrated in aqueous Zn−CO2 system. The NiMo alloy offers excellent activity by promoting hydrogen adsorption/desorption and chemically bonded carbon nanofiber assists catalytic activity by providing charge transfer. Due to superior characteristics, NiMo‐carbon nanofiber exhibits significant HER activity (over‐potential of 268 mV at 10 mA cm‐2) in CO2‐saturated 1 M KOH and superior cell performance in aqueous Zn−CO2 system (peak power density of 25 mW cm−2). In addition, the stability of the catalysts has also been investigated using chronopotentiometry and the results have compared with commercial Pt/C catalysts. We are hopeful that the present study will provide insights into developing non‐precious electrocatalysts, particularly for metal‐CO2 electrochemical conversion devices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cnma.202000099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The catalytic activity of BNPC-FeCo-900 (186 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and 82.46 ± 0.37 mV dec−1) compares favorably to other porous carbon electrocatalysts in alkaline medium, such as TS-NF-FO/PC5-0.25, SFCA-NiCo, and CN@Fe3Se4@C.

    “the catalytic activity of BNPC-FeCo-900 (186 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and 82.46 ± 0.37 mV dec−1) demonstrates a favorable comparison to other porous carbon electrocatalysts in an alkaline medium, such as TS-NF-FO/PC5-0.25 (207.3 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and 87.6 mV dec−1),49 SFCA-NiCo (179 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and 52 mV dec−1),50 and CN@Fe3Se4@C (168 mV at 10 mA cm−2 and 77 mV dec−1)51”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Asokan, A., Lim, C., Kim, J., Kwon, O., Lee, H., Joo, S., Jeong, H. Y., & Kim, G.
Affiliations
Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Guntae
Venue
ChemNanoMat
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-04-20
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
937-946
ISSN
2199-692X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014298717
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ChemNanoMat (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › CO2 Reduction Techniques and Catalysts
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced battery technologies research
Keywords
carbon nanofibers, hydrogen evolution reaction, electrochemical CO2 reduction, non-precious metal electrocatalysts, low-temperature chemical vapor deposition, hydrogen sorption, catalyst stability, CO2 utilization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review