The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Group Invariant Scattering
Abstract
This paper constructs translation‐invariant operators on $\font\open=msbm10 at 10pt\def\R{\hbox{\open R}}{\bf L}^2({{{\R}}}^d)$, which are Lipschitz‐continuous to the action of diffeomorphisms. A scattering propagator is a path‐ordered product of nonlinear and noncommuting operators, each of which computes the modulus of a wavelet transform. A local integration defines a windowed scattering transform, which is proved to be Lipschitz‐continuous to the action of C2 diffeomorphisms. As the window size increases, it converges to a wavelet scattering transform that is translation invariant. Scattering coefficients also provide representations of stationary processes. Expected values depend upon high‐order moments and can discriminate processes having the same power spectrum. Scattering operators are extended on L2(G), where G is a compact Lie group, and are invariant under the action of G. Combining a scattering on $\font\open=msbm10 at 10pt\def\R{\hbox{\open R}}{\bf L}^2({{{\R}}}^d)$ and on L2(SO(d)) defines a translation‐ and rotation‐invariant scattering on $\font\open=msbm10 at 10pt\def\R{\hbox{\open R}}{\bf L}^2({{{\R}}}^d)$. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
Cited by
Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives
Bengio, Y., Courville, A., & Vincent, P. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.50 · Cited by 13,001
Geometric Deep Learning: Going beyond Euclidean data
Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2017) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2017.2693418 · Cited by 3,661
Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Image Classification: A Comprehensive Review
Rawat, W., & Wang, Z. (2017) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco_a_00990 · Cited by 3,503
Invariant Scattering Convolution Networks
Bruna, J., & Mallat, S. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.230 · Cited by 1,633
Self-citationCadieu, C. F., Hong, H., Yamins, D. L. K., Pinto, N., Ardila, D., Solomon, E. A., Majaj, N. J., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2014) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003963 · Cited by 824
Metadata
- Authors
- Mallat, S.
- Venue
- Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-24
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1331-1398
- ISSN
- 0010-3640 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0312
- OpenAlex
- W1994906459
- Cited by
- 1,038
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 60.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Group Invariant Scattering. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpa.21413
- The paper
- Mallat, S. (2012). Group Invariant Scattering. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21413
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.