The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solving Random Quadratic Systems of Equations Is Nearly as Easy as Solving Linear Systems
Open accessAbstract
We consider the fundamental problem of solving quadratic systems of equations in , and is unknown. We propose a novel method, which starts with an initial guess computed by means of a spectral method and proceeds by minimizing a nonconvex functional as in the Wirtinger flow approach [13]. There are several key distinguishing features, most notably a distinct objective functional and novel update rules, which operate in an adaptive fashion and drop terms bearing too much influence on the search direction. These careful selection rules provide a tighter initial guess, better descent directions, and thus enhanced practical performance. On the theoretical side, we prove that for certain unstructured models of quadratic systems, our algorithms return the correct solution in linear time, i.e., in time proportional to reading the data {ai} and {yi} as soon as the ratio m/n between the number of equations and unknowns exceeds a fixed numerical constant. We extend the theory to deal with noisy systems in which we only have and prove that our algorithms achieve a statistical accuracy, which is nearly unimprovable. We complement our theoretical study with numerical examples showing that solving random quadratic systems is both computationally and statistically not much harder than solving linear systems of the same size—hence the title of this paper. For instance, we demonstrate empirically that the computational cost of our algorithm is about four times that of solving a least squares problem of the same size. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
Cios, K., & Shields, M. (1997) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(97)90018-7 · Cited by 22,059
Phase retrieval algorithms: a comparison
Fienup, J. R. (1982) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.21.002758 · Cited by 5,596
A practical algorithm for the determination of phase from image and diffraction plane pictures
Gerchberg, R. W. (1972) · Optik · Cited by 4,519
Trefethen, L. N., & Bau, III (1997) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898719574 · Cited by 3,301
Introduction to Nonparametric Estimation
Tsybakov, A. B. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/b13794 · Cited by 2,486
Introduction to the non-asymptotic analysis of random matrices
Vershynin, R. (2012) · Compressed Sensing · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511794308.006 · Cited by 2,150
Probability and Computing: Randomized Algorithms and Probabilistic Analysis
Mitzenmacher, M., & Upfal, E. (2005) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813603 · Cited by 1,733
PhaseLift: Exact and Stable Signal Recovery from Magnitude Measurements via Convex Programming
Candès, E. J., Strohmer, T., & Voroninski, V. (2013) · Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1002/cpa.21432 · Cited by 1,197
Self-citationThe Rotation of Eigenvectors by a Perturbation. III
Davis, C., & Kahan, W. M. (1970) · SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis · doi:10.1137/0707001 · Cited by 1,175
Phase Retrieval with Application to Optical Imaging: A contemporary overview
Shechtman, Y., Eldar, Y. C., Cohen, O., Chapman, H. N., Miao, J., & Segev, M. (2015) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2014.2352673 · Cited by 1,131
Cited by
Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overview
Chi, Y., Lu, Y. M., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.2937282 · Cited by 360
Self-citationStochastic Model-Based Minimization of Weakly Convex Functions
Davis, D., & Drusvyatskiy, D. (2019) · SIAM Journal on Optimization · doi:10.1137/18m1178244 · Cited by 258
Complete Dictionary Recovery Over the Sphere I: Overview and the Geometric Picture
Sun, J., Qu, Q., & Wright, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2016.2632162 · Cited by 213
Nonconvex Demixing From Bilinear Measurements
Dong, J., & Shi, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2018.2864660 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., & Candès, E. J.
- Venue
- Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-04-06
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 822-883
- ISSN
- 0010-3640 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0312
- OpenAlex
- W221278985
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 67.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Solving Random Quadratic Systems of Equations Is Nearly as Easy as Solving Linear Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cpa.21638
- The paper
- Chen, Y., & Candès, E. J. (2017). Solving Random Quadratic Systems of Equations Is Nearly as Easy as Solving Linear Systems. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.21638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.