Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are results on the non-emptiness and the uniqueness of Fréchet means for manifolds.
“There are results on the non-emptiness and the uniqueness of Fr´ echet means for manifolds (Karcher 1977, Kendall 1990).”
From Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data (2014) · cites this paper as Karcher 1977
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multiclass Brain–Computer Interface Classification by Riemannian Geometry
Barachant, A., Bonnet, S., Congedo, M., & Jutten, C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2172210 · Cited by 878 · see citing works
Probability measures on the space of persistence diagrams
Mileyko, Y., Mukherjee, S., & Harer, J. (2011) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/27/12/124007 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Topological pattern recognition for point cloud data
Carlsson, G. (2014) · Acta Numerica · doi:10.1017/s0962492914000051 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Hayat, M., Bennamoun, M., & El-Sallam, A. A. (2013) · 2013 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv.2013.6475003 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karcher, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Karcher, H.
- Venue
- Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1977-09
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 509-541
- ISSN
- 0010-3640 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0312
- OpenAlex
- W2109409043
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 66 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical Inequalities and Applications
- Keywords
- Riemannian geometry, optimal transport, gradient flow, mean curvature flow, Riemannian manifolds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review