Bioequivalence and comparative pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro 200 U/mL relative to insulin lispro (Humalog) 100 U/mL
Open accessAbstract
Insulin lispro 200 U/mL (IL200) is a new strength formulation of insulin lispro (Humalog®, IL100), developed as an option for diabetic patients on higher daily mealtime insulin doses. This phase 1, open‐label, 2‐sequence, 4‐period crossover, randomized, 8‐hour euglycemic clamp study aimed to demonstrate the bioequivalence of IL200 and IL100 after subcutaneous administration of 20 U (U) to healthy subjects (n = 38). Pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses were similar in both formulations. All 90%CIs for the ratios of area under the concentration‐versus‐time curve from time zero to the time of the last measurable concentration (AUC 0–tlast) and maximum observed drug concentration (C max), as well as the total glucose infused throughout the clamp (G tot) and the maximum glucose infusion rate (R max), were contained within 0.80 and 1.25. Time of maximum observed drug concentration (t max) was similar between formulations, with a median difference of 15 minutes and a 95%CI of the difference that included zero. Inter‐ and intrasubject variability estimates were similar for both formulations. Both formulations were well tolerated. IL200 was bioequivalent to IL100 after subcutaneous administration of 20‐U single doses, and PD responses were comparable between formulation strengths.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The U-200 formulations of insulin degludec, insulin lispro, and insulin lispro-aabc have pharmacokinetics similar to those of their U-100 counterparts.
“The U-200 formulations of insulin degludec, insulin lispro, and insulin lispro-aabc have pharmacokinetics similar to those of their U-100 counterparts (182-184).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [183]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1]Kahn BB, Flier JS. Obesity and insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 2000; 106: 473– 481. 10953022 PMC380258
- [2]Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M, et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980‐2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2014; 384: 766– 781. 24880830 PMC4624264
- [4]Watson L, Wilson BP, Alsop J, Kumar S. Weight and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes: what is the outcome of insulin initiation? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011; 13: 823– 831. 21481128
- [5]Aagren M, Luo W, Moes E. Heathcare utilization changes in relation to treatment intensification with insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes. Data from a large US managed‐care organization J Med Econom. 2010; 13(1) 16– 22. 19958212
- [6]Holleman F, Schmitt H, Rottiers R, et al. Reduced frequency of severe hypoglycemia and coma in well‐controlled IDDM patients treated with insulin lispro. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20(12): 1827– 1832. 9405901
- [7]Bebakar WM, Lim‐Abrahan MA, Jain AB, Seah D, Soewondo P. Safety and effectiveness of insulin aspart in type 2 diabetic patients: results from the ASEAN cohort of the A1chieve study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;100(Suppl 1): S17– S23. 23647713
- [10]Dunn MF. Zinc‐ligand interactions modulate assembly and stability of the insulin hexamer—a review. Biometals. 2005; 18(4): 295– 303. 16158220
- [11]Brange J, Langkjaer L. Chemical stability of insulin 3. Influence of excipients, formulation, and pH. Acta Pharm Nord. 1992; 4(3): 149– 158. 1418641
- [13]DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol. 1979; 237: E214– E223. 382871
- [14]Rave KM, Nosek L, de la Peña A. et al. Dose response of inhaled dry‐powder insulin and dose equivalence to subcutaneous insulin lispro Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(10) 2400– 2405. 16186270
Cited by
Sorted by citations
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Bajaj, M., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s009 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: Getting better all the time
Mathieu, C., Gillard, P., & Benhalima, K. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.39 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices
Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., Antalis, C. J., & Wright, E. E. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa015 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Optimal prandial timing of bolus insulin in diabetes management: a review
Slattery, D., Amiel, S. A., & Choudhary, P. (2018) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.13525 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Concentrated insulins: Clinical update of therapeutic options
Umpierrez, G. E., Holt, E. H., Einhorn, D., & McGill, J. B. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep-2019-0607 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
- Authors
- de la Peña, A., Seger, M., Soon, D., Scott, A. J., Reddy, S. R., Dobbins, M. A., Brown‐Augsburger, P., & Linnebjerg, H.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis IN USA
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-10-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-75
- ISSN
- 2160-763X (ISSN-L)
- 2160-7648
- PMC
- PMC5054907
- OpenAlex
- W2120352437
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 6.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
- Keywords
- insulin lispro, bioequivalence, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, subcutaneous insulin administration, euglycemic clamp, glucose infusion rate, diabetes mellitus, insulin dose
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Therapeutic Equivalency, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve, Young Adult, Insulin Lispro
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review