Single- and Multiple-Dose Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Profiles of ASP8062: Results From 2 Phase 1 Studies
Abstract
Abstract ASP8062 is an orally active γ‐amino‐butyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor positive allosteric modulator currently in phase 2 development. Safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of ASP8062 were evaluated in 2 studies in healthy subjects. The first study (a first‐in‐human study) evaluated single ascending doses (SAD) of ASP8062. The second study was composed of 2 parts: part 1 evaluated multiple ascending doses (MAD) of ASP8062 for 14 days, and part 2 was a single‐dose arm to assess the PK of ASP8062 in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Fifty‐six men (SAD) and 56 subjects (24 women and 32 men; MAD) were enrolled. Across the SAD dosing range, area under the concentration‐time curve was dose proportional; increases in maximum plasma concentration appeared linear but were slightly less than dose proportional. Time to maximal concentration and half‐life were 1‐4 hours and ∼40‐50 hours, respectively; no food effect was observed. ASP8062 PK properties at steady state were similar to those following a single dose. Steady state was achieved by ∼day 9 with ∼2‐fold accumulation, and ASP8062 was detected in CSF. ASP8062 was well tolerated; no clear evidence of ASP8062's effects on safety, cognition, drug withdrawal, or suicidal ideation/behavior was observed. These data support the development of ASP8062 in indications where the GABAB receptor is a target.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In two phase 1 human clinical trials, ASP8062 demonstrated good tolerability, with no observed drug-related effects on safety, cognitive function, withdrawal symptoms, or suicidal ideation.
“In two phase 1 human clinical trials investigating safety and tolerability, ASP8062 demonstrated good tolerability, with no observed drug-related effects on safety, cognitive function, withdrawal symptoms, or suicidal ideation [60].”
From A Narrative Review of Current and Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Alcohol Use Disorder (2024) · cites this paper as [60]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Walzer, M., Marek, G. J., Wu, R., Nagata, M., & Han, D.
- Affiliations
- Astellas Pharma (United States) (US)
- Astellas Pharma (Japan) (JP)
- Parexel Glendale California USA
- Corresponding author
- Walzer, Mark
- Venue
- Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-01-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-306
- ISSN
- 2160-763X (ISSN-L)
- 2160-7648
- OpenAlex
- W2998813706
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Astellas Pharma US
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Keywords
- GABAB receptors, positive allosteric modulators, pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability, cerebrospinal fluid, single ascending dose, multiple ascending dose, dose proportionality, steady-state pharmacokinetics, food effect, drug withdrawal, suicidal ideation
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Morpholines, Pyrimidines, GABA Modulators, Area Under Curve, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review