Cited by 12Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasChemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigationCancer-related Molecular Pathways

Phase 1 Concentration‐QTc and Cardiac Safety Analysis of the MDM2 Antagonist KRT‐232 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors, Multiple Myeloma, or Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Open access
Taylor, Adekemi, Lee, Dana, Allard, Martine, Poland, Bill, Greg Slatter, J.·2021·Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development

Abstract

Cardiac safety and plasma concentration‐QTc interval analyses were completed using data from 2 phase 1 studies of the selective mouse double minute chromosome 2 antagonist, KRT‐232, in patients with solid tumors or multiple myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received KRT‐232 doses of 15 to 480 mg once daily (QD; N = 130). A linear mixed‐effects model related change from baseline Fridericia‐corrected QT interval (ΔQTcF) to KRT‐232 plasma concentrations. The final model included parameters for the intercept (with between‐subject variability), KRT‐232 concentration–ΔQTcF slope, and baseline QTcF effect on the intercept. Diagnostic plots indicated an adequate model fit. Mean (90% confidence interval) predicted ΔQTcF values at the maximum clinical dose (480 mg QD) were 2.04 (0.49‐3.60) milliseconds for patients with solid tumors and 4.52 (2.35‐6.69) milliseconds for patients with AML. Because the 90% confidence interval upper bound of the mean ΔQTcF was predicted to be below 10 milliseconds at doses up to 480 mg QD in patients with solid tumors, multiple myeloma, or AML, KRT‐232 does not result in clinically meaningful QT prolongation at the doses currently under investigation in clinical trials. No significant cardiac safety concerns were identified at these doses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpdd.903

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In vitro experiments demonstrated that AMG-232 induced p53 signal transduction and inhibited tumor cell proliferation in three p53 wild tumor cell lines (SJSA-1, HCT116, and ACHN).

    “In vitro experiments demonstrated that AMG-232 induced p53 signal transduction and inhibited tumor cell proliferation in three p53 wild tumor cell lines (SJSA-1, HCT116, and ACHN).”
  • AMG-232 is more selective than RG-7112 for p53 wild cells.

    “Studies have shown that AMG-232 is more selective than RG-7112 for p53 wild cells.”
  • In vivo experiments showed that AMG-232 (10, 25, 75 mg kg−1, orally, once a day) activated the p53 pathway, effectively inhibited the growth of xenogeneic tumors in mice, blocked viral DNA synthesis, induced apoptosis, and caused dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition (ED50 = 16 mg kg−1).

    “In vivo experiments showed that AMG-232 (10, 25, 75 mg kg−1, orally, once a day) activated the p53 pathway, effectively inhibited the growth of xenogeneic tumors in mice, blocked viral DNA synthesis, induced apoptosis, and caused dose-dependent tumor growth inhibition (ED50 = 16 mg kg−1).385–387”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17 · Cited by 12

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]Allard MWD, Krejsa CM, Slatter JG. Exposure–macrophage inhibitory cytokine‑1 (MIC‑1) response analysis of the MDM2 antagonist KRT‑232 in patients with advanced solid tumors, multiple myeloma, or acute myeloid leukemia. HemaSphere. 2020; 4:S1, Abstract EP519.

Authors
Taylor, A., Lee, D., Allard, M., Poland, B., & Greg Slatter, J.
Affiliations
  • Certara (United States) (US)
  • Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. (United States) (US)
  • Kartos Therapeutics, Inc. Bellevue Washington USA
Corresponding author
Taylor, Adekemi
Venue
Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-01-18
Volume
10
Issue
8
Pages
918-926
ISSN
  • 2160-763X (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-7648
OpenAlex
W3125373932
Cited by
12
References
17
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
MDM2 inhibitors, cardiac safety, QTc prolongation, solid tumors, multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia, linear mixed models, pharmacokinetics
MeSH terms
Carboxylic Acids, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Electrocardiography, Heart Function Tests, Humans, Male, Multiple Myeloma, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review