Cited by 73Scientific Computing and Data ManagementCloud Computing and Resource ManagementDistributed and Parallel Computing Systems

Experiences building Globus Genomics: a next‐generation sequencing analysis service using Galaxy, Globus, and Amazon Web Services

Open access
Madduri, Ravi K., Sulakhe, Dinanath, Lacinski, Lukasz, Liu, Bo, Rodriguez, Alex, Chard, Kyle, Dave, Utpal J., Foster, Ian T.·2014·Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Abstract

SUMMARY: We describe Globus Genomics, a system that we have developed for rapid analysis of large quantities of next‐generation sequencing genomic data. This system achieves a high degree of end‐to‐end automation that encompasses every stage of data analysis including initial data retrieval from remote sequencing centers or storage (via the Globus file transfer system); specification, configuration, and reuse of multistep processing pipelines (via the Galaxy workflow system); creation of custom Amazon Machine Images and on‐demand resource acquisition via a specialized elastic provisioner (on Amazon EC2); and efficient scheduling of these pipelines over many processors (via the HTCondor scheduler). The system allows biomedical researchers to perform rapid analysis of large next‐generation sequencing datasets in a fully automated manner, without software installation or a need for any local computing infrastructure. We report performance and cost results for some representative workloads. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpe.3274

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 73

Authors
Madduri, R. K., Sulakhe, D., Lacinski, L., Liu, B., Rodriguez, A., Chard, K., Dave, U. J., & Foster, I. T.
Affiliations
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
  • Computation Institute University of Chicago and Argonne National Laboratory Chicago IL USA
Corresponding author
Madduri, Ravi K.
Venue
Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-04-08
Volume
26
Issue
13
Pages
2266-2279
ISSN
  • 1532-0626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-0634
OpenAlex
W1721251433
Cited by
73
References
29
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7
FWCI
20.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Cardiovascular Research Grid (R24HL085343)
  • US Department of Energy (DE-AC02-06CH11357)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Keywords
next-generation sequencing data analysis, Amazon EC2, automated bioinformatics pipeline, cloud computing, on-demand resource provisioning, genomic data processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review