Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey
Abstract
Summary Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by data silos and the need for global data fusion. It offers a distributed machine learning framework with privacy‐preserving features, allowing model training without the need to collect user data. However, FL also presents significant security and privacy threats that hinder its widespread adoption. The requirements of privacy and security in FL are inherently conflicting. Privacy necessitates the concealment of individual client updates, while security requires the disclosure of client updates to detect anomalies. While most existing research focused on the privacy and security aspects of FL, very few studies have addressed the compatibility of these two demands. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a comprehensive defense scheme that ensures privacy, security, and compatibility in FL. We categorize the existing literature into two key directions: privacy defense and security defense. Privacy defense includes methods based on additive masks, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environment, whereas security defense encompasses distance‐, performance‐, clustering‐, and similarity‐based anomaly detection techniques and statistical information‐based anomaly update bypassing techniques when the server is trusted and privacy‐compatible anomaly update detection techniques when the server is not trusted. In addition, this article prese…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FL is a key PPML technique and widely studied, as reviewed in [167], [12], [46] on its taxonomy, advancements, and security challenges.
“Furthermore, FL is a key PPML technique and widely studied, as reviewed in [167], [12], [46] on its taxonomy, advancements, and security challenges.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 179 · Cited by 29
- Authors
- Han, Q., Lu, S., Wang, W., Qu, H., Li, J., & Gao, Y.
- Affiliations
- Ocean University of China (CN)
- Key Laboratory of Network Cryptography Technology of Henan Information Engineering University Zhengzhou China
- Institute of Information Engineering (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Han, Qingdi
- Venue
- Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2024-03-19
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 13
- ISSN
- 1532-0626 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-0634
- OpenAlex
- W4393020883
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 179
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- federated learning, privacy preservation, robustness, anomaly detection, malicious clients, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, trusted execution environments, decentralized federated learning, blockchain, defense framework
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review