Cited by 29Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Privacy preserving and secure robust federated learning: A survey

Han, Qingdi, Lu, Siqi, Wang, Wenhao, Qu, Haipeng, Li, Jingsheng, Gao, Yang·2024·Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Abstract

Summary Federated learning (FL) has emerged as a promising solution to address the challenges posed by data silos and the need for global data fusion. It offers a distributed machine learning framework with privacy‐preserving features, allowing model training without the need to collect user data. However, FL also presents significant security and privacy threats that hinder its widespread adoption. The requirements of privacy and security in FL are inherently conflicting. Privacy necessitates the concealment of individual client updates, while security requires the disclosure of client updates to detect anomalies. While most existing research focused on the privacy and security aspects of FL, very few studies have addressed the compatibility of these two demands. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a comprehensive defense scheme that ensures privacy, security, and compatibility in FL. We categorize the existing literature into two key directions: privacy defense and security defense. Privacy defense includes methods based on additive masks, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, and trusted execution environment, whereas security defense encompasses distance‐, performance‐, clustering‐, and similarity‐based anomaly detection techniques and statistical information‐based anomaly update bypassing techniques when the server is trusted and privacy‐compatible anomaly update detection techniques when the server is not trusted. In addition, this article prese…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpe.8084

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 179 · Cited by 29

Authors
Han, Q., Lu, S., Wang, W., Qu, H., Li, J., & Gao, Y.
Affiliations
  • Ocean University of China (CN)
  • Key Laboratory of Network Cryptography Technology of Henan Information Engineering University Zhengzhou China
  • Institute of Information Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
Han, Qingdi
Venue
Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-03-19
Volume
36
Issue
13
ISSN
  • 1532-0626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-0634
OpenAlex
W4393020883
Cited by
29
References
179
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Concurrency and Computation Practice and Experience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
federated learning, privacy preservation, robustness, anomaly detection, malicious clients, differential privacy, homomorphic encryption, trusted execution environments, decentralized federated learning, blockchain, defense framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review