The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taverna: lessons in creating a workflow environment for the life sciences
Open accessAbstract
Life sciences research is based on individuals, often with diverse skills, assembled into research groups. These groups use their specialist expertise to address scientific problems. The in silico experiments undertaken by these research groups can be represented as workflows involving the co‐ordinated use of analysis programs and information repositories that may be globally distributed. With regards to Grid computing, the requirements relate to the sharing of analysis and information resources rather than sharing computational power. The myGrid project has developed the Taverna Workbench for the composition and execution of workflows for the life sciences community. This experience paper describes lessons learnt during the development of Taverna. A common theme is the importance of understanding how workflows fit into the scientists' experimental context. The lessons reflect an evolving understanding of life scientists' requirements on a workflow environment, which is relevant to other areas of data intensive and exploratory science. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Cited by
A Taxonomy of Workflow Management Systems for Grid Computing
Yu, J., & Buyya, R. (2005) · Journal of Grid Computing · doi:10.1007/s10723-005-9010-8 · Cited by 834
Kell, D. B. (2009) · BMC Medical Genomics · doi:10.1186/1755-8794-2-2 · Cited by 554
The design and realisation of the Virtual Research Environment for social sharing of workflows
De Roure, D., Goble, C., & Stevens, R. (2009) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.06.010 · Cited by 432
Self-citationA survey on provenance: What for? What form? What from?
Herschel, M., Diestelkämper, R., & Ben Lahmar, H. (2017) · The VLDB Journal · doi:10.1007/s00778-017-0486-1 · Cited by 300
Provenance Collection Support in the Kepler Scientific Workflow System
Altintas, I., Barney, O., & Jaeger-Frank, E. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11890850_14 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Oinn, T., Greenwood, M., Addis, M., Alpdemir, M. N., Ferris, J., Glover, K., Goble, C., Goderis, A., Hull, D., Marvin, D., Li, P., Lord, P., Pocock, M. R., Senger, M., Stevens, R., Wipat, A., & Wroe, C.
- Venue
- Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12-13
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1067-1100
- ISSN
- 1532-0626 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-0634
- OpenAlex
- W2172143128
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 121.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
