The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Force Fields for Studying the Structure and Dynamics of Ionic Liquids: A Critical Review of Recent Developments
Abstract
Classical molecular dynamics simulations are a valuable tool to study the mechanisms that dominate the properties of ionic liquids (ILs) on the atomistic and molecular level. However, the basis for any molecular dynamics simulation is an accurate force field describing the effective interactions between all atoms in the IL. Normally this is done by empirical potentials which can be partially derived from quantum mechanical calculations on simple subunits or have been fitted to experimental data. Unfortunately, the number of accurate classical non‐polarizable models for ILs that allow a reasonable description of both dynamical and statical properties is still low. However, the strongly increasing computational power allows one to apply computationally more expensive methods, and even polarizable‐force‐field‐based models on time and length scales long enough to ensure a proper sampling of the phase space. This review attempts to summarize recent achievements and methods in the development of classical force fields for ionic liquids. As this class of salts covers a large number of compounds, we focus our review on imidazolium‐based ionic liquids, but show that the main conclusions are valid for non‐imidazolium salts, too. Insight obtained from recent electronic density functional results into the parametrization of partial charges and on the influence of polarization effects in bulk ILs is highlighted. An overview is given of different available force fields, ranging from the atomistic to the coarse‐grained level, covering implicit as well as explicit modeling of polarization. We show that the recently popular usage of the ion charge as fit parameter can looked upon as treating polarization effects in a mean‐field matter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lee, C., Yang, W., & Parr, R. G. (1988) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 · Cited by 100,874
A fast and robust algorithm for Bader decomposition of charge density
Henkelman, G., Arnaldsson, A., & Jónsson, H. (2006) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2005.04.010 · Cited by 10,723
Cited by
Deep Eutectic Solvents: Physicochemical Properties and Gas Separation Applications
García, G., Aparicio, S., Ullah, R., & Atilhan, M. (2015) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef5028873 · Cited by 1,112
Hydrogen bonding in ionic liquids
Hunt, P. A., Ashworth, C. R., & Matthews, R. P. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00278d · Cited by 836
Multiscale Studies on Ionic Liquids
Dong, K., Liu, X., Dong, H., Zhang, X., & Zhang, S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00776 · Cited by 773
Revisiting OPLS Force Field Parameters for Ionic Liquid Simulations
Doherty, B., Zhong, X., Gathiaka, S., Li, B., & Acevedo, O. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00520 · Cited by 594
Metadata
- Authors
- Dommert, F., Wendler, K., Berger, R., Delle Site, L., & Holm, C.
- Venue
- ChemPhysChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-17
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1625-1637
- ISSN
- 1439-4235 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-7641
- OpenAlex
- W2101746269
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Force Fields for Studying the Structure and Dynamics of Ionic Liquids: A Critical Review of Recent Developments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cphc.201100997
- The paper
- Dommert, F., Wendler, K., Berger, R., Delle Site, L., & Holm, C. (2012). Force Fields for Studying the Structure and Dynamics of Ionic Liquids: A Critical Review of Recent Developments. ChemPhysChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201100997
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.