Cited by 23Electrostatics and Colloid InteractionsChemical and Physical StudiesSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies

Anion Layering and Steric Hydration Repulsion on Positively Charged Surfaces in Aqueous Electrolytes

Open access
Hu, Qingyun, Weber, Christian, Cheng, Hsiu‐Wei, Renner, Frank Uwe, Valtiner, Markus·2017·ChemPhysChem

Abstract

The molecular structure at charged solid/liquid interfaces is vital for many chemical or electrochemical processes, such as adhesion, catalysis, or the stability of colloidal dispersions. How cations influence structural hydration forces and interactions across negatively charged surfaces has been studied in great detail. However, how anions influence structural hydration forces on positively charged surfaces is much less understood. Herein we report force versus distance profiles on freshly cleaved mica using atomic force microscopy with silicon tips. We characterize steric anion hydration forces for a set of common anions (Cl−, ClO 4−, NO 3−, SO 42− and PO 43−) in pure acids at pH ≈1, where protons are the co‐ions. Solutions containing anions with low hydration energies exhibit repulsive structural hydration forces, indicating significant ion and/or water structuring within the first 1–2 nm on a positively charged surface. We attribute this to specific adsorption effects within the Stern layer. In contrast, ions with high hydration energies show exponentially repulsive hydration forces, indicating a lower degree of structuring within the Stern layer. The presented data demonstrates that anion hydration forces in the inner double layer are comparable to cation hydration forces, and that they qualitatively correlate with hydration free energies. This work contributes to understanding interaction processes in which positive charge is screened by anions within an electrolyte.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cphc.201700865

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, Q., Weber, C., Cheng, H., Renner, F. U., & Valtiner, M.
Affiliations
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Nachhaltige Materialien (DE)
  • TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE)
  • Hasselt University (BE)
Corresponding author
  • Hu, Qingyun
  • Valtiner, Markus
Venue
ChemPhysChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-10-16
Volume
18
Issue
21
Pages
3056-3065
ISSN
  • 1439-4235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-7641
OpenAlex
W2752693496
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ChemPhysChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • reposiTUm (TU Wien) (submittedVersion)
  • reposiTUm (TU Wien) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Research Council (677663)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Physical and Theoretical Chemistry › Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Chemical and Physical Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Keywords
positively charged surfaces, mica, Stern layer, hydration free energy, ion adsorption, electrolyte screening, force-distance profiles, negatively charged surfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review