The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flow Cytometry: An Overview
Abstract
Flow cytometry is a technology that provides rapid multi‐parametric analysis of single cells in solution. Flow cytometers utilize lasers as light sources to produce both scattered and fluorescent light signals that are read by detectors such as photodiodes or photomultiplier tubes. These light signals are converted into electronic signals that are analyzed by a computer and written to a standardized format (.fcs) data file. Cell populations can be analyzed and/or purified based on their fluorescent or light scattering characteristics. A variety of fluorescent reagents are utilized in flow cytometry. These include fluorescently conjugated antibodies, nucleic acid binding dyes, viability dyes, ion indicator dyes, and fluorescent expression proteins. Flow cytometry is a powerful tool that has applications in immunology, molecular biology, bacteriology, virology, cancer biology, and infectious disease monitoring. It has seen dramatic advances over the last 30 years, allowing unprecedented detail in studies of the immune system and other areas of cell biology. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Modern FACS instruments can sort cells by up to 15 or more fluorescently labeled species per cell (42), which would allow the linking of complex cell phenotypes to their lipidome to provide enhanced detail on phenotype-driven heterogeneity.”
From FACS-assisted single-cell lipidome analysis of phosphatidylcholines and sphingomyelins in cells of different lineages (2023) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From Donor to the Lab: A Fascinating Journey of Primary Cell Lines
Richter, M., Piwocka, O., Musielak, M., Piotrowski, I., Suchorska, W. M., & Trzeciak, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.711381 · Cited by 174
Sensors and Techniques for On-Line Determination of Cell Viability in Bioprocess Monitoring
Rösner, L., Walter, F., Ude, C., John, G., & Beutel, S. (2022) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering9120762 · Cited by 42
Hancock, S. E., Ding, E., Johansson Beves, E., Mitchell, T., & Turner, N. (2023) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1016/j.jlr.2023.100341 · Cited by 13
Mayer, O., Wirsching, H., Schlingmann, S., Welzel, J., & Schuh, S. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010159 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- McKinnon, K. M.
- Affiliations
- Vaccine Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health Bethesda Maryland
- Venue
- Current Protocols in Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 1934-3671
- 1934-368X
- PMC
- PMC5939936
- Cited by
- 728
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review