The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review of the Iron–Air Secondary Battery for Energy Storage
Abstract
Recent interest in the iron–air flow battery, known since the 1970s, has been driven by incentives to develop low‐cost, environmentally friendly and robust rechargeable batteries. With a predicted open‐circuit potential of 1.28 V, specific charge capacity of <300 A h kg−1 and reported efficiencies of 96, 40 and 35 % for charge, voltage and energy, respectively, the iron–air system could be well suited for a range of applications, including automotive. A number of challenges still need to be resolved, including: efficient and moderate‐cost bifunctional oxygen electrodes, low‐cost iron electrodes able to decrease corrosion and hydrogen evolution, new cell designs using additive manufacturing technologies and mathematical models to improve battery performance. This Minireview considers the thermodynamics and kinetics aspects of the iron–air battery, the operational variables and cell components, thereby highlighting current challenges and assessing recent developments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improved Oxygen Reduction Activity on Pt 3 Ni(111) via Increased Surface Site Availability
Stamenkovic, V. R., Fowler, B., Mun, B. S., Wang, G., Ross, P. N., Lucas, C. A., & Marković, N. M. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1135941 · Cited by 4,421
Cited by
Carbon-Based Fibers for Advanced Electrochemical Energy Storage Devices
Chen, S., Qiu, L., & Cheng, H.-M. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00466 · Cited by 555
Recyclable metal fuels for clean and compact zero-carbon power
Bergthorson, J. M. (2018) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2018.05.001 · Cited by 435
Direct combustion of recyclable metal fuels for zero-carbon heat and power
Bergthorson, J. M., Goroshin, S., Soo, M. J., Julien, P., Palecka, J., Frost, D. L., & Jarvis, D. J. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.037 · Cited by 434
Yi, J., Liang, P., Liu, X., Wu, K., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Xia, Y., & Zhang, J. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee01991f · Cited by 434
Lobato-Peralta, D. R., Okoye, P. U., & Alegre, C. (2024) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235140 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- McKerracher, R. D., Ponce de Leon, C., Wills, R. G. A., Shah, A. A., & Walsh, F. C.
- Venue
- ChemPlusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-09-26
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 323-335
- ISSN
- 2192-6506 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978676310
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review of the Iron–Air Secondary Battery for Energy Storage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cplu.201402238
- The paper
- McKerracher, R. D., Ponce de Leon, C., Wills, R. G. A., Shah, A. A., & Walsh, F. C. (2015). A Review of the Iron–Air Secondary Battery for Energy Storage. ChemPlusChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201402238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
