Cited by 179Complex Systems and DynamicsCellular Automata and ApplicationsChaos, Complexity, and Education

Complexity and information: Measuring emergence, self-organization, and homeostasis at multiple scales

Open access
Gershenson, Carlos, Fernández, Nelson·2012·Complexity

Abstract

Abstract Concepts used in the scientific study of complex systems have become so widespread that their use and abuse has led to ambiguity and confusion in their meaning. In this article, we use information theory to provide abstract and concise measures of complexity, emergence, self‐organization, and homeostasis. The purpose is to clarify the meaning of these concepts with the aid of the proposed formal measures. In a simplified version of the measures (focusing on the information produced by a system), emergence becomes the opposite of self‐organization, while complexity represents their balance. Homeostasis can be seen as a measure of the stability of the system. We use computational experiments on random Boolean networks and elementary cellular automata to illustrate our measures at multiple scales. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity, 2012

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cplx.21424

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach allows us to evaluate the axioms underlying the measures, as opposed to trying to compare different measures without a common ground.

    “Having in mind that there are several different measures already proposed (Prokopenko et al., 2009; Gershenson and Fern´ andez, 2012), this approach allows us to evaluate the axioms underlying the measures, as opposed to trying to compare different measures without a common ground.”

    From Information Measures of Complexity, Emergence, Self-organization, Homeostasis, and Autopoiesis (2013) · cites this paper as Gershenson and Fern´ andez, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gershenson, C., & Fernández, N.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
  • Universidad de Los Andes (VE)
Corresponding author
Gershenson, Carlos
Venue
Complexity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-09-24
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
29-44
ISSN
  • 1076-2787 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0526
OpenAlex
W2143902672
Cited by
179
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Complexity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Chaos, Complexity, and Education
Keywords
complexity measures, emergence, self-organization, homeostasis, information theory, information production, system stability, random Boolean networks, elementary cellular automata, multiscale analysis, complex systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review