Effectiveness of Day Hospital Mentalization‐Based Treatment for Patients with Severe Borderline Personality Disorder: A Matched Control Study
Open accessAbstract
The present study extends the body of evidence regarding the effectiveness of day hospital Mentalization‐Based Treatment (MBT) by documenting the treatment outcome of a highly inclusive group of severe borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients, benchmarked by a carefully matched group who received other specialized psychotherapeutic treatments (OPT). Structured diagnostic interviews were conducted to assess diagnostic status at baseline. Baseline, 18‐month treatment outcome and 36‐month treatment outcome (after the maintenance phase) on psychiatric symptoms (Brief Symptom Inventory) and personality functioning (118‐item Severity Indices of Personality Problems) were available for 29 BPD patients assigned to MBT, and an initial set of 175 BPD patients assigned to OPT. Propensity scores were used to determine the best matches for the MBT patients within the larger OPT group, yielding 29 MBT and 29 OPT patients for direct comparison. Treatment outcome was analysed using multilevel modelling. Pre to post effect sizes were consistently (very) large for MBT, with a Cohen's d of −1.06 and −1.42 for 18 and 36 months, respectively, for the reduction in psychiatric symptoms, and d s ranging from 0.81 to 2.08 for improvement in domains of personality functioning. OPT also yielded improvement across domains but generally of moderate magnitude. In conclusion, the present matched control study, executed by an independent research institute outside the UK, demonstrated the effectiveness of day hospital MBT in a highly inclusive and severe group of BPD patients, beyond the benchmark provided by a mix of specialized psychotherapy programmes. Interpretation of the (large) between condition effects warrants cautionary caveats given the non‐randomized design, as well as variation in treatment dosages. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
With a two-sided α = 0.05, power 0.80, and correlation 0.50 between repeated measures, 59 participants per treatment group (118 total) with at least one follow-up measurement are required to detect a medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.50) on the BPDSI-IV-ado.
“Based on the BPDSI-IV-ado and with a two-sided α = 0.05, a power of 0.80 and a correlation of 0.50 between the repeated measures, based on Bales et al. [65] and Hutsebaut et al. [43], we require 59 participants in each treatment group (118 in total) with at least 1 follow-up measurement.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 132
- Authors
- Bales, D. L., Timman, R., Andrea, H., Busschbach, J. J. V., Verheul, R., & Kamphuis, J. H.
- Affiliations
- De Viersprong (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Kamphuis, Jan H.
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-07-24
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 409-417
- ISSN
- 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0879
- OpenAlex
- W2125947534
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dare.uva.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Tilburg University Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- borderline personality disorder, mentalization-based treatment, day hospital treatment, matched controls, psychiatric symptoms, personality functioning, treatment outcomes, maintenance phase
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Borderline Personality Disorder, Day Care, Medical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Psychotherapy, Severity of Illness Index, Case-Control Studies, Treatment Outcome, Theory of Mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review