Cited by 18Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Exploring Outcomes Related to Anxiety and Depression in Completers of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Complicated Grief Treatment

Glickman, Kim, Shear, M. Katherine, Wall, Melanie·2016·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Unlabelled The present study examines a more fine-grained analysis of anxiety-related and depression-related outcomes amongst a sample of treatment completers who were assigned to complicated grief treatment (CGT) (n = 35) or interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) (n = 34) in a previously reported randomized controlled trial. We examined effects of antidepressant use and measures of anxiety and depression, focusing especially on guilt related to the death or deceased and grief-related avoidance in order to further understand the differential effectiveness of CGT and IPT amongst participants who received the full course of treatment. Analyses showed that CGT produced greater reductions in anxiety and depressive symptoms including negative thoughts about the future and grief-related avoidance. CGT's advantage over IPT in lowering depression was most pronounced amongst those not taking antidepressants. Our results further elucidate CGT effects and support the idea that CG and major depressive disorder are distinct conditions. Key practitioner message Targeted treatment for complicated grief (CG) produces benefits in associated mood and anxiety symptoms and CG symptoms. Amongst patients with CG, interpersonal psychotherapy seems relatively ineffective in ameliorating depressive symptoms. Grief-related depressive symptoms may not respond to standard treatments unless CG symptoms are also addressed. Reducing grief-related symptoms, such as anxieties about the future, guilt related to th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.1940

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Randomized studies have demonstrated the efficacy of both interpersonal therapy and complicated grief-focused therapy in treating PGD, with significantly better results with complicated grief-focused therapy.

    “Other randomized studies have demonstrated the efficacy of both interpersonal therapy and complicated grief-focused therapy in treating PGD, with significantly better results being reported with complicated grief-focused therapy.”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Glickman et al., 2016

  • Complicated grief therapy achieved a greater decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms, including negative thoughts about the future and grief-related avoidance, compared with bereavement-focused Interpersonal Therapy in older bereaved adults.

    “-Complicated grief therapy had a significantly greater effect and greater tolerability compared with bereavement-focused Interpersonal Therapy in older adults who have experienced bereavement and achieved a greater decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms including negative thoughts about the future and grief-related avoidance (Shear et al., 2014;Glickman et al., 2016;Simon, 2015).”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Glickman et al., 2016

  • Complicated grief therapy had a significantly greater effect and greater tolerability compared with bereavement-focused Interpersonal Therapy in older adults who have experienced bereavement.

    “-Complicated grief therapy had a significantly greater effect and greater tolerability compared with bereavement-focused Interpersonal Therapy in older adults who have experienced bereavement and achieved a greater decrease in anxiety and depression symptoms including negative thoughts about the future and grief-related avoidance (Shear et al., 2014;Glickman et al., 2016;Simon, 2015).”

    From Prolonged grief disorder treatment: An approach to COVID-19 grief (2023) · cites this paper as Glickman et al., 2016

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 18

Authors
Glickman, K., Shear, M. K., & Wall, M.
Affiliations
  • York College, City University of New York (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Glickman, Kim
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-22
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
118-124
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W1940743356
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
complicated grief, interpersonal psychotherapy, depression, anxiety, guilt, antidepressant use, major depressive disorder, treatment outcomes
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Death, Depressive Disorder, Female, Grief, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review