Poor metacognition in Narcissistic and Avoidant Personality Disorders: four psychotherapy patients analysed using the Metacognition Assessment Scale
Abstract
Personality Disorders (PDs) are hypothesized to involve a decrement in the capacity to understand one's own thoughts and feelings. Patients may not, for example, recognize their own emotions or put together integrated representations of self with other. Some researchers have suggested that this deficit varies between the different PDs. However, empirical evidence that might confirm or disconfirm this hypothesis is scarce. The goal of the present research is to evaluate the metacognitive capacity in four participants, two with Narcissistic Personality Disorder and two with Avoidant Personality Disorder. Using the Metacognition Assessment Scale to analyse the transcripts of their first year of psychotherapy, we have found that three of the four participants displayed difficulties in recognizing their inner states and in linking them to the environmental and psychological causes behind them. There was, additionally, a milder deficit in the ability to integrate multiple images of self with other. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant associations between narcissistic features and identity instability have been established, with narcissism being linked with inflated but unstable representations of self.
“More recently, significant associations between narcissistic features and identity instability have also been established, with narcissism being linked with inflated but unstable representations of self [19, 22, 65, 71].”
From “It’s not you, it’s me”: identity disturbance as the main contributor to interpersonal problems in pathological narcissism (2023) · cites this paper as [22]
Dialectical Behavior Therapy is recognized to support NPD people in determining their own needs and values and answer to responses from others appropriately.
“This skills-based approach is recognized to support NPD people in determining their own needs and values and answer to responses from others appropriately (67).”
From The dark side of empathy in narcissistic personality disorder (2023) · cites this paper as [67]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 64 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Dimaggio, G., Procacci, M., Nicolò, G., Popolo, R., Semerari, A., Carcione, A., & Lysaker, P. H.
- Affiliations
- Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dimaggio, Giancarlo
- ORCID
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 386-401
- ISSN
- 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0879
- OpenAlex
- W2049505392
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- metacognition, narcissistic personality disorder, avoidant personality disorder, self-awareness, emotion recognition, self-other integration, psychotherapy transcripts, personality disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review