The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting
Abstract
The stakeholder theory recognizes that, besides shareholders and creditors, there exists a broad range of agents who are interested in companies' attitudes towards sustainability. Through corporate social reporting, the social and environmental effects of companies' economic actions are communicated to interest groups. However, the information contained in financial and social reports tends to be presented quite separately from that in the others, and this may lead to confusion among users. Therefore, several major companies have introduced an integrated reporting system, which coherently summarizes the information available, thus making stakeholders participants in business management. Corporate governance mechanisms such as the Board of Directors play an important role in good practices of corporate social responsibility, implementing policies of stakeholder engagement, including processes to achieve holistic transparency. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the influence played by certain features of the Board of Directors in the degree of information integration presented by leading non‐financial multinational firms. Specifically, we examined 568 companies from 15 countries, for the period 2008–2010. The results obtained show that growth opportunities, the size of a company and its management bodies, together with gender diversity, are the most important factors in the integrated dissemination of information. This effect has been confirmed for the Anglo‐Saxon, Germanic and Latin models of corporate governance. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2001) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/s0165-4101(01)00018-0 · Cited by 8,097
Cited by
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2665 · Cited by 322
Arena, C., Bozzolan, S., & Michelon, G. (2015) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1350 · Cited by 273
Communicating CSR: Integrated approach or Selfie? Evidence from the Milan Stock Exchange
Montecchia, A., Giordano, F., & Grieco, C. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.01.099 · Cited by 69
The role of women’s leadership in environmental NGOs’ online accountability
Saraite-Sariene, L., Galán-Valdivieso, F., Alonso-Cañadas, J., & García-Tabuyo, M. (2022) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-09-2020-0403 · Cited by 10
Silveira, A. D. M. D., & Donaggio, A. R. F. (2020) · DESC - Direito, Economia e Sociedade Contemporânea · doi:10.33389/desc.v2n2.2019.p11-42 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-10
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 219-233
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2162071038
- Cited by
- 726
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 52.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.1294
- The paper
- Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The Role of the Board in the Dissemination of Integrated Corporate Social Reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1294
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.