The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers
Open accessAbstract
Since company boards are increasingly discussing ‘sustainability’, it becomes necessary to examine the nature of sustainability drivers. Most approaches to corporate sustainability drivers have focused either on internal or external drivers. This paper is aimed at providing a more holistic perspective on the different corporate sustainability drivers in order to better catalyse change from the unsustainable status quo to a more sustainable‐oriented state. Empirical data was collected from experts and company leaders. The findings show that, internally, leadership and the business case are the most important drivers, whilst the most important external drivers are reputation, customer demands and expectations, and regulation and legislation. The paper proposes a corporate sustainability driver model, which considers both internal and external drivers, and complements these with drivers that connect them. This offers a holistic perspective on how companies can be more proactive in their journey to becoming more sustainability orientated. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:
Salzmann, O., Ionescu-somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.007 · Cited by 930
Change management--or change leadership?
Gill, R. (2002) · Journal of Change Management · doi:10.1080/714023845 · Cited by 513
Cited by
Unlocking circular business: A framework of barriers and drivers
Tura, N., Hanski, J., Ahola, T., Ståhle, M., Piiparinen, S., & Valkokari, P. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.202 · Cited by 698
Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors
Rosati, F., & Faria, L. G. D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.107 · Cited by 674
Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.123 · Cited by 641
The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context
Cheng, C. C. J., Yang, C.-L., & Sheu, C. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050 · Cited by 607
Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles
Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M. Á., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J. M., & Muñoz-Torres, M. J. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11030915 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Lozano, R.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-04-03
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-44
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2122183843
- Cited by
- 875
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 57.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/csr.1325
- The paper
- Lozano, R. (2015). A Holistic Perspective on Corporate Sustainability Drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
