The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms: an empirical analysis of the European paper industry
Abstract
This paper examines the relationship between the environmental and economic performance of firms in the European paper manufacturing industry. It initially discusses possible functional relationships between environmental and economic performance rooted in different theoretical frameworks and links these to recent empirical and theoretical analyses of the Porter hypothesis. Following this, it reports the results of an empirical study carried out in the European paper industry. Findings fit better with ‘traditionalist’ reasoning about the relationship between environmental and economic performance, which predicts the relationship to be uniformly negative. In particular they confirm the necessity for a more differentiated view of the Porter hypothesis. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A RESOURCE-BASED PERSPECTIVE ON CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND PROFITABILITY.
RUSSO, M. V., & FOUTS, P. A. (1997) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/257052 · Cited by 4,805
Green and competitive: ending the stalemate
(1995) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(95)99997-e · Cited by 3,848
Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0836(199603)5:1<30::aid-bse38>3.0.co;2-q · Cited by 1,943
Jaffe, A. B., & Peterson, S. R. (1995) · Journal of Economic Literature · Cited by 1,874
Tightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm?
Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.119 · Cited by 1,744
Walley, N., & Whitehead, B. W. (1994) · Harvard business review · Cited by 1,428
Estimating the Demand for a New Technology: Bt Cotton and Insecticide Policies
Hubbell, B. J., Marra, M. C., & Carlson, G. A. (2000) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/0002-9092.00010 · Cited by 720
The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects
Barbera, A. J., & McConnell, V. D. (1990) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/0095-0696(90)90051-y · Cited by 499
Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness: Strategic Implications for the Firm
Esty, D. C., & Porter, M. E. (1998) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.35 · Cited by 404
Contemporary Environmental Accounting
Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781351282529 · Cited by 364
Jaggi, B., & Freedman, M. (1992) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.1992.tb00652.x · Cited by 345
Environmental indicators for business: a review of the literature and standardisation methods
Olsthoorn, X., Tyteca, D., Wehrmeyer, W., & Wagner, M. (2001) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/s0959-6526(01)00005-1 · Cited by 299
Self-citationEnvironmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital
Xepapadeas, A., & de Zeeuw, A. (1999) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1061 · Cited by 297
Environmental and Financial Performance: Are They Related?
Cohen, M. A., Fenn, S. A., & Naimon, J. S. (1995) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 264
Taxing Variable Cost: Environmental Regulation as Industrial Policy
Simpson, R. D., & Bradford, III (1996) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.1996.0019 · Cited by 224
Corporate environmental performance evaluation: evidence from the MEPI project
Tyteca, D., Carlens, J., Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wehrmeyer, W., & Wagner, M. (2001) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.312 · Cited by 127
Self-citation
Cited by
Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview
Stefan, A., & Paul, L. (2008) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2008.35590353 · Cited by 1,759
The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review
Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-019-04164-1 · Cited by 1,537
Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
Business models for sustainability from a system dynamics perspective
Abdelkafi, N., & Täuscher, K. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615592930 · Cited by 443
Wagner, M. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.021 · Cited by 445
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wagner, M., Van Phu, N., Azomahou, T., & Wehrmeyer, W.
- Venue
- Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-08-19
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 133-146
- ISSN
- 1535-3958 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-3966
- OpenAlex
- W2026089993
- Cited by
- 473
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.