The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nanostructured Carbon and Carbon Nanocomposites for Electrochemical Energy Storage Applications
Abstract
Electrochemical energy storage is one of the important technologies for a sustainable future of our society, in times of energy crisis. Lithium‐ion batteries and supercapacitors with their high energy or power densities, portability, and promising cycling life are the cores of future technologies. This Review describes some materials science aspects on nanocarbon‐based materials for these applications. Nanostructuring (decreasing dimensions) and nanoarchitecturing (combining or assembling several nanometer‐scale building blocks) are landmarks in the development of high‐performance electrodes for with long cycle lifes and high safety. Numerous works reviewed herein have shown higher performances for such electrodes, but mostly give diverse values that show no converging tendency towards future development. The lack of knowledge about interface processes and defect dynamics of electrodes, as well as the missing cooperation between material scientists, electrochemists, and battery engineers, are reasons for the currently widespread trial‐and‐error strategy of experiments. A concerted action between all of these disciplines is a prerequisite for the future development of electrochemical energy storage devices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/451652a · Cited by 19,612
Fe and Pt carbon nanotubes for the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to oxygenates
Gangeri, M., Perathoner, S., Caudo, S., Centi, G., Amadou, J., Bégin, D., Pham-Huu, C., Ledoux, M. J., Tessonnier, J.-P., & Su, D. S. (2009) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2008.11.001 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Cited by
Active and stable carbon nanotube/nanoparticle composite electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction
Chung, H. T., Won, J. H., & Zelenay, P. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2944 · Cited by 820
Templated nanocarbons for energy storage
Nishihara, H., & Kyotani, T. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201715 · Cited by 745
An Aqueous Zinc‐Ion Battery Based on Copper Hexacyanoferrate
Trócoli, R., & La Mantia, F. (2015) · ChemSusChem · doi:10.1002/cssc.201403143 · Cited by 734
Carbonaceous Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors
Hao, L., Li, X., & Zhi, L. (2013) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201301204 · Cited by 710
Mesoporous materials and electrochemistry
Walcarius, A. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35322a · Cited by 623
Metadata
- Authors
- Su, D. S., & Schlögl, R.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 136-168
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2123942020
- Cited by
- 671
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 29.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.