Cited by 201Catalysis for Biomass ConversionBiofuel production and bioconversionIonic liquids properties and applications

Which Controls the Depolymerization of Cellulose in Ionic Liquids: The Solid Acid Catalyst or Cellulose?

Rinaldi, Roberto, Meine, Niklas, vom Stein, Julia, Palkovits, Regina, Schüth, Ferdi·2010·ChemSusChem

Abstract

Cellulose is a renewable and widely available feedstock. It is a biopolymer that is typically found in wood, straw, grass, municipal solid waste, and crop residues. Its use as raw material for biofuel production opens up the possibility of sustainable biorefinery schemes that do not compete with food supply. Tapping into this feedstock for the production of biofuels and chemicals requires—as the first‐step—its depolymerization or its hydrolysis into intermediates that are more susceptible to chemical and/or biological transformations. We have shown earlier that solid acids selectively catalyze the depolymerization of cellulose solubilized in 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride (BMIMCl) at 100 °C. Here, we address the factors responsible for the control of this reaction. Both cellulose and solid acid catalysts have distinct and important roles in the process. Describing the depolymerization of cellulose by the equivalent number of scissions occurring in the cellulosic chains allows a direct correlation between the product yields and the extent of the polymer breakdown. The effect of the acid strength on the depolymerization of cellulose is discussed in detail. Practical aspects of the reaction, concerning the homogeneous nature of the catalysis in spite of the use of a solid acid catalyst, are thoroughly addressed. The effect of impurities present in the imidazolium‐based ionic liquids on the reaction performance, the suitability of different ionic liquids as solvents, and the recyclability of Amberlyst 15DRY and BMIMCl are also presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.200900281

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 56 · Cited by 201

Authors
Rinaldi, R., Meine, N., vom Stein, J., Palkovits, R., & Schüth, F.
Affiliations
Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung (DE)
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-15
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
266-276
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W1968421685
Cited by
201
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
FWCI
15.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
Keywords
cellulose depolymerization, ionic liquids, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, solid acid catalysts, acid strength, cellulose hydrolysis, homogeneous catalysis, catalyst reusability, imidazolium ionic liquids, biofuel feedstock, biorefinery
MeSH terms
Catalysis, Cellulose, Hydrolysis, Imidazoles, Styrenes, Temperature, Ionic Liquids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review