Which Controls the Depolymerization of Cellulose in Ionic Liquids: The Solid Acid Catalyst or Cellulose?
Abstract
Cellulose is a renewable and widely available feedstock. It is a biopolymer that is typically found in wood, straw, grass, municipal solid waste, and crop residues. Its use as raw material for biofuel production opens up the possibility of sustainable biorefinery schemes that do not compete with food supply. Tapping into this feedstock for the production of biofuels and chemicals requires—as the first‐step—its depolymerization or its hydrolysis into intermediates that are more susceptible to chemical and/or biological transformations. We have shown earlier that solid acids selectively catalyze the depolymerization of cellulose solubilized in 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride (BMIMCl) at 100 °C. Here, we address the factors responsible for the control of this reaction. Both cellulose and solid acid catalysts have distinct and important roles in the process. Describing the depolymerization of cellulose by the equivalent number of scissions occurring in the cellulosic chains allows a direct correlation between the product yields and the extent of the polymer breakdown. The effect of the acid strength on the depolymerization of cellulose is discussed in detail. Practical aspects of the reaction, concerning the homogeneous nature of the catalysis in spite of the use of a solid acid catalyst, are thoroughly addressed. The effect of impurities present in the imidazolium‐based ionic liquids on the reaction performance, the suitability of different ionic liquids as solvents, and the recyclability of Amberlyst 15DRY and BMIMCl are also presented.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The T0.01/10h for [C4C1im][MeCO2] is 102 °C.
“Due to the lack of data in the literature, we measured T 0.01/10 h for [C 4 C 1 im][MeCO 2 ] and determined it as 102 °C.174”
From Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids (2013) · cites this paper as [174]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 201
- Authors
- Rinaldi, R., Meine, N., vom Stein, J., Palkovits, R., & Schüth, F.
- Affiliations
- Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung (DE)
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-15
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 266-276
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W1968421685
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Catalysis for Biomass Conversion
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Keywords
- cellulose depolymerization, ionic liquids, 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride, solid acid catalysts, acid strength, cellulose hydrolysis, homogeneous catalysis, catalyst reusability, imidazolium ionic liquids, biofuel feedstock, biorefinery
- MeSH terms
- Catalysis, Cellulose, Hydrolysis, Imidazoles, Styrenes, Temperature, Ionic Liquids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review