The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Solar Water Splitting: Progress Using Hematite (α‐Fe2O3) Photoelectrodes
Open accessAbstract
Photoelectrochemical (PEC) cells offer the ability to convert electromagnetic energy from our largest renewable source, the Sun, to stored chemical energy through the splitting of water into molecular oxygen and hydrogen. Hematite (α‐Fe 2 O 3) has emerged as a promising photo‐electrode material due to its significant light absorption, chemical stability in aqueous environments, and ample abundance. However, its performance as a water‐oxidizing photoanode has been crucially limited by poor optoelectronic properties that lead to both low light harvesting efficiencies and a large requisite overpotential for photoassisted water oxidation. Recently, the application of nanostructuring techniques and advanced interfacial engineering has afforded landmark improvements in the performance of hematite photoanodes. In this review, new insights into the basic material properties, the attractive aspects, and the challenges in using hematite for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting are first examined. Next, recent progress enhancing the photocurrent by precise morphology control and reducing the overpotential with surface treatments are critically detailed and compared. The latest efforts using advanced characterization techniques, particularly electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, are finally presented. These methods help to define the obstacles that remain to be surmounted in order to fully exploit the potential of this promising material for solar energy conversion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode
FUJISHIMA, A., & HONDA, K. (1972) · Nature · doi:10.1038/238037a0 · Cited by 34,169
Computational high-throughput screening of electrocatalytic materials for hydrogen evolution
Greeley, J., Jaramillo, T. F., Bonde, J., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2006) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat1752 · Cited by 4,097
Photocatalytic Water Splitting: Recent Progress and Future Challenges
Maeda, K., & Domen, K. (2010) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1021/jz1007966 · Cited by 2,739
Cited by
Progress, challenge and perspective of heterogeneous photocatalysts
Qu, Y., & Duan, X. (2013) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c2cs35355e · Cited by 1,466
Meng, F., Li, J., Cushing, S. K., Zhi, M., & Wu, N. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja404851s · Cited by 643
Photoinduced charge transfer processes in solar photocatalysis based on modified TiO 2
Park, H., Kim, H.-I., Moon, G.-H., & Choi, W. (2016) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c5ee02575c · Cited by 582
Highly porous non-precious bimetallic electrocatalysts for efficient hydrogen evolution
Lu, Q., Hutchings, G. S., Yu, W., Zhou, Y., Forest, R. V., Tao, R., Rosen, J., Yonemoto, B. T., Cao, Z., Zheng, H., et al. (2015) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms7567 · Cited by 543
Iwashina, K., & Kudo, A. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2050315 · Cited by 457
Metadata
- Authors
- Sivula, K., Le Formal, F., & Grätzel, M.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-17
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 432-449
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W1976555219
- Cited by
- 2,678
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 66.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.