The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kinetics and Reaction Engineering of Levulinic Acid Production from Aqueous Glucose Solutions
Abstract
We have developed a kinetic model for aqueous‐phase production of levulinic acid from glucose using a homogeneous acid catalyst. The proposed model shows a good fit with experimental data collected in this study in a batch reactor. The model was also fitted to steady‐state data obtained in a plug flow reactor (PFR) and a continuously stirred tank reactor (CSTR). The kinetic model consists of four key steps: (1) glucose dehydration to form 5‐hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF); (2) glucose reversion/degradation reactions to produce humins (highly polymerized insoluble carbonaceous species); (3) HMF rehydration to form levulinic acid and formic acid; and (4) HMF degradation to form humins. We use our model to predict the optimal reactor design and operating conditions for HMF and levulinic acid production in a continuous reactor system. Higher temperatures (180–200 °C) and shorter reaction times (less than 1 min) are essential to maximize the HMF content. In contrast, relatively low temperatures (140–160 °C) and longer residence times (above 100 min) are essential for maximum levulinic acid yield. We estimate that a maximum HMF carbon yield of 14 % can be obtained in a PFR at 200 °C and a reaction time of 10 s. Levulinic acid can be produced at 57 % carbon yield (68 % of the theoretical yield) in a PFR at 149 °C and a residence time of 500 min. A system of two consecutive PFR reactors shows a higher performance than a PFR and CSTR combination. However, compared to a single PFR, there is no distinct advantage to implement a system of two consecutive reactors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Catalytic conversion of biomass to biofuels
Alonso, D. M., Bond, J. Q., & Dumesic, J. A. (2010) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c004654j · Cited by 2,333
Cited by
Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass into chemicals and fuels
Deng, W., Feng, Y., Fu, J., Guo, H., Guo, Y., Han, B., Jiang, Z., Kong, L., Li, C., Liu, H., et al. (2023) · Green Energy & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.gee.2022.07.003 · Cited by 854
From lignocellulosic biomass to levulinic acid: A review on acid-catalyzed hydrolysis
Kang, S., Fu, J., & Zhang, G. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.016 · Cited by 580
Chen, X., Zhang, K., Xiao, L.-P., Sun, R.-C., & Song, G. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-019-1644-z · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Weingarten, R., Cho, J., Xing, R., Conner, W. C., & Huber, G. W.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1280-1290
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2109401656
- Cited by
- 205
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kinetics and Reaction Engineering of Levulinic Acid Production from Aqueous Glucose Solutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cssc.201100717
- The paper
- Weingarten, R., Cho, J., Xing, R., Conner, W. C., & Huber, G. W. (2012). Kinetics and Reaction Engineering of Levulinic Acid Production from Aqueous Glucose Solutions. ChemSusChem. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201100717
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.