The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modeling Practical Performance Limits of Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting Based on the Current State of Materials Research
Abstract
Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is a means to store solar energy in the form of hydrogen. Knowledge of practical limits for this process can help researchers assess their technology and guide future directions. We develop a model to quantify loss mechanisms in PEC water splitting based on the current state of materials research and calculate maximum solar‐to‐hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiencies along with associated optimal absorber band gaps. Various absorber configurations are modeled considering the major loss mechanisms in PEC devices. Quantitative sensitivity analyses for each loss mechanism and each absorber configuration show a profound impact of both on the resulting STH efficiencies, which can reach upwards of 25 % for the highest performance materials in a dual stacked configuration. Higher efficiencies could be reached as improved materials are developed. The results of the modeling also identify and quantify approaches that can improve system performance when working with imperfect materials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MoS 2 Nanoparticles Grown on Graphene: An Advanced Catalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Li, Y., Wang, H., Xie, L., Liang, Y., Hong, G., & Dai, H. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja201269b · Cited by 5,001
Kibsgaard, J., Chen, Z., Reinecke, B. N., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3439 · Cited by 3,234
Self-citationHydrogen Oxidation and Evolution Reaction Kinetics on Platinum: Acid vs Alkaline Electrolytes
Sheng, W., Gasteiger, H. A., & Shao-Horn, Y. (2010) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.3483106 · Cited by 1,829
Ni–Mo Nanopowders for Efficient Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution
McKone, J. R., Sadtler, B. F., Werlang, C. A., Lewis, N. S., & Gray, H. B. (2013) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs300691m · Cited by 798
Cited by
McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Ferrer, I. M., Chatman, S. M., Peters, J. C., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja510442p · Cited by 4,145
Self-citationJin, H., Wang, J., Su, D., Wei, Z., Pang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5127165 · Cited by 1,765
Semiconducting materials for photoelectrochemical energy conversion
Sivula, K., & van de Krol, R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2015.10 · Cited by 1,645
Catalyzing the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) with molybdenum sulfide nanomaterials
Benck, J. D., Hellstern, T. R., Kibsgaard, J., Chakthranont, P., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2014) · ACS Catalysis · doi:10.1021/cs500923c · Cited by 1,617
Self-citationProspects and Challenges for Solar Fertilizers
Comer, B. M., Fuentes, P., Dimkpa, C. O., Liu, Y.-H., Fernandez, C. A., Arora, P., Realff, M., Singh, U., Hatzell, M. C., & Medford, A. J. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.001 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Seitz, L. C., Chen, Z., Forman, A. J., Pinaud, B. A., Benck, J. D., & Jaramillo, T. F.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1372-1385
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2143194153
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
