Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective Route to 2‐Propenyl Aryls Directly from Wood by a Tandem Organosolv and Palladium‐Catalysed Transfer Hydrogenolysis

Galkin, Maxim V., Samec, Joseph S. M.·2014·ChemSusChem

Abstract

A tandem organosolv pulping and Pd‐catalysed transfer hydrogenolysis depolymerisation and deoxygenation has been developed. The tandem process generated 2‐methoxy‐4‐(prop‐1‐enyl)phenol in 23 % yield (92 % theoretical monomer yield) starting from pine wood and 2,6‐dimethoxy‐4‐(prop‐1‐enyl)phenol in 49 % yield (92 % theoretical monomer yield) starting from birch wood. Only endogenous hydrogen from wood was consumed, and the reaction was performed using green solvents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.201402017

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Galkin, M. V., & Samec, J. S. M.
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-06-06
Volume
7
Issue
8
Pages
2154-2158
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W2096663178
Cited by
282
References
3
FWCI
11.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.