Carbon Dioxide Capture with Ionic Liquids and Deep Eutectic Solvents: A New Generation of Sorbents
Abstract
High cost and high energy penalty for CO 2 uptake from flue gases are important obstacles in large-scale industrial applications, and developing efficient technology for CO 2 capture from technical and economic points is crucial. Ionic liquids (ILs) show the potential for CO 2 separation owing to their inherent advantages, and have been proposed as alternatives to overcome the drawbacks of conventional sorbents. Chemical modification of ILs to improve their performance in CO 2 absorption has received more attention. Deep eutectic solvents (DESs) as a new generation of ILs are considered as more economical alternatives to cope with the deficiencies of high cost and high viscosity of conventional ILs. This Review discusses the potential of functionalized ILs and DESs as CO 2 sorbents. Incorporation of CO 2 -philic functional groups, such as amine, in cation and/or anion moiety of ILs can promot their absorption capacity. In general, the functionalization of the anion part of ILs is more effective than the cation part. DESs represent favorable solvent properties and are capable of capturing CO 2 , but the research work is scarce and undeveloped compared to the studies conducted on ILs. It is possible to develop novel DESs with promising absorption capacity. However, more investigation needs to be carried out on the mechanism of CO 2 sorption of DESs to clarify how these novel sorbents can be adjusted and fine-tuned to be best tailored as optimized media for CO 2 capture.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last two years, DESs have been studied as potential sorbents for CO2 capture and storage.
“In the last two years, DESs have been studied as potential sorbents for CO2 capture and storage [17,18].”
From Deep eutectic solvents: overcoming 21st century challenges (2019) · cites this paper as [18]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 205 · Cited by 406
- Authors
- Sarmad, S., Mikkola, J., & Ji, X.
- Affiliations
- Luleå University of Technology (SE)
- Åbo Akademi University (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Sarmad, Shokat
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-12-30
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 324-352
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2561481995
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 205
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 15
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Åbo Akademi University Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Keywords
- CO2 capture, ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, CO2 sorbents, flue gas, functionalized ionic liquids, CO2 absorption mechanism, CO2 separation
- MeSH terms
- Adsorption, Carbon Dioxide, Solubility, Ionic Liquids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review