Cited by 26Advancements in Battery MaterialsAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesAqueous and Flow Batteries

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enabling Reversible (De)Lithiation of Aluminum by using Bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide‐Based Electrolytes

Abstract

Aluminum, a cost-effective and abundant metal capable of alloying with Li up to around 1000 mAh g -1 , is a very appealing anode material for high energy density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, despite repeated efforts in the past three decades, reports presenting stable cycling performance are extremely rare. This study concerns recent findings on the highly reversible (de)lithiation of a micro-sized Al anode (m-Al) by using bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (FSI)-based electrolytes. By using this kind of electrolyte, m-Al can deliver a specific capacity over 900 mAh g -1 and superior Coulombic efficiency (96.8 %) to traditional carbonate- and glyme-based electrolytes (87.8 % and 88.1 %, respectively), which represents the best performance ever obtained for an Al anode without sophisticated structure design. The significantly improved electrochemical performance, which paves the way to realizing high-performance Al-based high energy density LIBs, can be attributed the peculiar solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formed by the FSI-containing electrolyte.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.201801806

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. 10.1038/451652a · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1021/cr500207g · DOI
  4. 10.1039/c3cs60177c · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ncomms8872 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.017 · DOI
  7. 10.1039/C3CC47900E · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.001 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.207 · DOI
  10. 10.1039/C6EE01295G · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.019 · DOI
  12. 10.1021/acsami.6b04406 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/jp506567p · DOI
  14. 10.1002/aenm.201400054 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02895 · DOI
  16. 10.1149/1.2752985 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 26

Metadata

Authors
Qin, B., Jeong, S., Zhang, H., Ulissi, U., Vieira Carvalho, D., Varzi, A., & Passerini, S.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU) Helmholtzstraße 11 89081 Ulm Germany
Corresponding author
  • Varzi, Alberto
  • Passerini, Stefano
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-11-05
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
208-212
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W2895495812
Cited by
26
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China Scholarship Council
  • Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aqueous and Flow Batteries
Keywords
aluminum anode, lithium-ion batteries, solid electrolyte interphase, Coulombic efficiency, high energy density, carbonate electrolyte, glyme-based electrolytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review