The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Enabling Reversible (De)Lithiation of Aluminum by using Bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide‐Based Electrolytes
Abstract
Aluminum, a cost-effective and abundant metal capable of alloying with Li up to around 1000 mAh g -1 , is a very appealing anode material for high energy density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, despite repeated efforts in the past three decades, reports presenting stable cycling performance are extremely rare. This study concerns recent findings on the highly reversible (de)lithiation of a micro-sized Al anode (m-Al) by using bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (FSI)-based electrolytes. By using this kind of electrolyte, m-Al can deliver a specific capacity over 900 mAh g -1 and superior Coulombic efficiency (96.8 %) to traditional carbonate- and glyme-based electrolytes (87.8 % and 88.1 %, respectively), which represents the best performance ever obtained for an Al anode without sophisticated structure design. The significantly improved electrochemical performance, which paves the way to realizing high-performance Al-based high energy density LIBs, can be attributed the peculiar solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) formed by the FSI-containing electrolyte.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite aluminum being investigated as a potential lithium storage material, there have been few publications reporting stable high-capacity performance during cycling test of the anode [6,7].”
From Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication (2024) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 16
- 10.1038/451652a · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/cr500207g · DOI
- 10.1039/c3cs60177c · DOI
- 10.1038/ncomms8872 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.10.017 · DOI
- 10.1039/C3CC47900E · DOI
- 10.1016/j.elecom.2010.12.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.207 · DOI
- 10.1039/C6EE01295G · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.04.019 · DOI
- 10.1021/acsami.6b04406 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp506567p · DOI
- 10.1002/aenm.201400054 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02895 · DOI
- 10.1149/1.2752985 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Solid-State Diffusion Bonding of Aluminum to Copper for Bimetallic Anode Fabrication
de Prado, J., Børresen, B. T., Utrilla, V., & Ureña, A. (2024) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma17215333 · Cited by 6
“Despite aluminum being investigated as a potential lithium storage material, there have been few publications reporting stable high-capacity performance during cycling test of the anode [6,7].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, B., Jeong, S., Zhang, H., Ulissi, U., Vieira Carvalho, D., Varzi, A., & Passerini, S.
- Affiliations
- Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
- Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU) Helmholtzstraße 11 89081 Ulm Germany
- Corresponding author
- Varzi, Alberto
- Passerini, Stefano
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-11-05
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 208-212
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W2895495812
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ChemSusChem (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- China Scholarship Council
- Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Aqueous and Flow Batteries
- Keywords
- aluminum anode, lithium-ion batteries, solid electrolyte interphase, Coulombic efficiency, high energy density, carbonate electrolyte, glyme-based electrolytes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review