The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable Direct Recycling of Lithium‐Ion Batteries via Solvent Recovery of Electrode Materials
Abstract
Separation of electrode materials from their current collectors is an enabling step toward recovering critical materials from spent lithium‐ion batteries. In the presented research, a highly efficient, cost‐effective, and environmentally sustainable separation process was developed for that purpose. Ethylene glycol, a vital commodity chemical as an antifreeze and polymer precursor, is used to delaminate electrode materials at low temperatures in seconds without altering the crystalline structure and morphology of active electrode materials. The recovered current collectors were intact without any corrosion. The authors also found that the solvent could be continuously reused, leading to the development of a closed‐loop ecosystem and lithium‐ion battery circular economy. The ultrafast delamination was driven by the competitive inhibition of binding through the weakening of hydrogen bonding. The ethylene glycol‐based separation is a sustainable electrode recovery process that paves the way for battery recycling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Olivetti, E. A., Ceder, G., Gaustad, G. G., & Fu, X. (2017) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.019 · Cited by 1,572
Recycling End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Lithium-Ion Batteries
Chen, M., Ma, X., Chen, B., Arsenault, R., Karlson, P., Simon, N., & Wang, Y. (2019) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.014 · Cited by 1,316
Dunn, J. B., Gaines, L., Kelly, J. C., James, C., & Gallagher, K. G. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03029j · Cited by 561
Cited by
Li, J., Fleetwood, J., Hawley, W. B., & Kays, W. (2022) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00565 · Cited by 895
Self-citationA Systematic Review on Lithium-Ion Battery Disassembly Processes for Efficient Recycling
Wu, S., Kaden, N., & Dröder, K. (2023) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries9060297 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, Y., Muralidharan, N., Li, J., Essehli, R., & Belharouak, I.
- Venue
- ChemSusChem
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2020-09-11
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 5664-5670
- ISSN
- 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
- 1864-564X
- OpenAlex
- W3046815166
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.