Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol over Non−Cu‐based Heterogeneous Catalysts

Sha, Feng, Han, Zhe, Tang, Shan, Wang, Jijie, Li, Can·2020·ChemSusChem

Abstract

The increasing atmospheric CO 2 level makes CO 2 reduction an urgent challenge facing the world. Catalytic transformation of CO 2 into chemicals and fuels utilizing renewable energy is one of the promising approaches toward alleviating CO 2 emissions. In particular, the selective hydrogenation of CO 2 to methanol utilizing renewable hydrogen potentially enables large scale transformation of CO 2. The Cu‐based catalysts have been extensively investigated in CO 2 hydrogenation. However, it is not only limited by long‐term instability but also displays unsatisfactory catalytic performance. The supported metal‐based catalysts (Pd, Pt, Au, and Ag) can achieve high methanol selectivity at low temperatures. The mixed oxide catalysts represented by M a ZrOx (M a=Zn, Ga, and Cd) solid solution catalysts present high methanol selectivity and catalytic activity as well as excellent stability. This Review focuses on the recent advances in developing Non−Cu‐based heterogeneous catalysts and current understandings of catalyst design and catalytic performance. First, the thermodynamics of CO 2 hydrogenation to methanol is discussed. Then, the progress in supported metal‐based catalysts, bimetallic alloys or intermetallic compounds catalysts, and mixed oxide catalysts is discussed. Finally, a summary and a perspective are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cssc.202002054

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Sha, F., Han, Z., Tang, S., Wang, J., & Li, C.
Venue
ChemSusChem
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-11-17
Volume
13
Issue
23
Pages
6160-6181
ISSN
  • 1864-5631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1864-564X
OpenAlex
W3095409808
Cited by
166
References
1
FWCI
4.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.