Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative evaluation of several DNA binding dyes in the detection of apoptosis‐associated chromatin degradation by flow cytometry

Open access
Telford, William G., King, Louis E., Fraker, Pamela J.·1992·Cytometry

Abstract

Mouse thymocytes readily undergo apoptosis‐associated DNA degradation upon exposure to glucocorticoids or ionizing radiation. It has been previously shown that flow cytometric cell cycle analysis of propidium iodide‐stained apoptotic thymocytes results in the appearance of a distinct cell cycle region (the A 0 region) below the G 0/G 1 region. Cells in this region were shown to be undergoing apoptosis, and determination of apoptosis by flow cytometric analysis was proposed as a superior method for evaluating thymocyte apoptosis. In this study, a variety of DNA binding dyes with diverse primary binding mechanisms were evaluated for their ability to detect glucocorticoid and ionizing radiatiom‐induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes. Apoptotic thymocytes stained with DNA binding dyes from the phenanthridinium, acridine, actinomycin, chromomycinone, anthracycline, and bisbenzimidazole groups all demonstrated clearly defined A 0 regions with percentages comparable to those obtained for propidium iodide. These results indicate that the appearance of the A 0 region is not dependent on a particular dye binding characteristic and may be the consequence of extensive changes in chromatin structure resulting in a significant degree of dye exclusion.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cyto.990130205

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 367

Metadata

Authors
Telford, W. G., King, L. E., & Fraker, P. J.
Venue
Cytometry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-01
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
137-143
ISSN
  • 0196-4763 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0320
OpenAlex
W2135438467
Cited by
367
References
0
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative evaluation of several DNA binding dyes in the detection of apoptosis‐associated chromatin degradation by flow cytometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.990130205
The paper
Telford, W. G., King, L. E., & Fraker, P. J. (1992). Comparative evaluation of several DNA binding dyes in the detection of apoptosis‐associated chromatin degradation by flow cytometry. Cytometry. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990130205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.