Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 562

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intracellular phospho‐protein staining techniques for flow cytometry: Monitoring single cell signaling events

Open access
Krutzik, Peter O., Nolan, Garry P.·2003·Cytometry Part A

Abstract

Background: Recent advances in intracellular staining techniques, cytometer technology, fluorescent reagents, and antibody production have expanded the number of intracellular antigens that can be analyzed by flow cytometry. Measurement of protein phosphorylation with phospho‐specific antibodies has given insight into kinase signaling cascades. However, available techniques for phospho‐epitope staining can differ greatly, making it necessary to understand the differences between the outcomes when such techniques are applied and to develop robust and reproducible methods of application. Methods: Ten different cellular fixation and permeabilization techniques were tested for their ability to provide phospho‐specific staining. Combinations of formaldehyde, methanol, ethanol, acetone, Triton X‐100, and saponin were used as fixation and permeabilization reagents. Phospho‐specific antibodies were labeled with Alexa Fluor dyes to provide multicolor analysis of different signaling events simultaneously within individual cells. Results: Fixing cells with 1.5% formaldehyde followed by permeabilization in methanol gave optimal results for pERK, pp38, pJNK, pStat1, pStat5, and pStat6 staining. Alteration of formaldehyde fixation and methanol permeabilization times affected measurements of phosphorylation induction. Phospho‐specific flow cytometric analyses correlated well with Western blotting, providing cross platform validation of the technique. Conclusions: Measuring phosphorylation events by flow cytometry provides a rapid and efficient way to measure kinase cascades in individual cells. Stability of phospho‐epitopes in methanol allows long‐term storage of samples prior to analysis. Multiple signaling cascades can be monitored simultaneously through the use of different fluorophore labels to determine specificity of ligands or inhibitors. Application of optimized techniques to heterogeneous cell types such as peripheral blood or murine splenocytes may allow signaling to be analyzed simultaneously in immune cell subsets. Cytometry Part A 55A:61–70, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cyto.a.10072

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 562

Metadata

Authors
Krutzik, P. O., & Nolan, G. P.
Venue
Cytometry Part A
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09-17
Volume
55A
Issue
2
Pages
61-70
ISSN
  • 1552-4922 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4930
OpenAlex
W2091824579
Cited by
562
References
0
FWCI
10.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intracellular phospho‐protein staining techniques for flow cytometry: Monitoring single cell signaling events. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cyto.a.10072
The paper
Krutzik, P. O., & Nolan, G. P. (2003). Intracellular phospho‐protein staining techniques for flow cytometry: Monitoring single cell signaling events. Cytometry Part A. https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.10072

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.