Cited by 55Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Impact of depression on treatment effectiveness and gains maintenance in social phobia: a naturalistic study of cognitive behavior group therapy

Marom, Sofi, Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva, Aderka, Idan M., Weizman, Abraham, Hermesh, Haggai·2009·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

Background The impact of depression on cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT) for social phobia (SP) in a naturalistic outpatient setting was examined after treatment termination and at 1-year follow-up. Methods Consecutive SP outpatients (N=219) were diagnosed using a structured interview. CBGT was provided in 18 1.5-hr weekly sessions. At pretreatment and posttreatment questionnaires and clinician ratings were administered. Self-report measures were obtained at 1-year follow-up. The main outcome measure was the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Results CBGT was found to be effective in reducing both social anxiety (effect size=1.23) as well as depression (effect size=0.94). Individuals with generalized social phobia (GSP) and individuals with specific social phobia (SSP) differed in their presenting psychopathology and in their response to CBGT. Among treatment completers, 44% GSPs and 37% SSPs achieved at least 50% improvement, and 44% GSPs and 87% SSPs reported distress and functioning within the normal range at the end of treatment. Among SPs diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) at the onset of treatment, SP symptoms aggravated during the follow-up period, whereas SPs not diagnosed with MDD experienced a further alleviation of SP symptoms during follow-up. CBGT provided in a public clinic to non-selected, mostly unmedicated and comorbid patients, is an effective treatment for the majority of SP sufferers. Conclusions MDD at the onset of CBGT was not associated…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20390

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies found that despite higher depression and SAD severity at pre- and post-treatment, rates of improvement did not differ.

    “However, other studies have found that despite higher depression and SAD severity at pre- and post-treatment, rates of improvement have not differed (e.g., Erwin, Heimberg, Juster, & Mindlin, 2002; Marom, Gilboa-Schechtman, Aderka, Wiezman, & Hermesh, 2009; Smits, Minhajuddin, & Jarrett, 2009).”

    From An Integrated, Acceptance-Based Behavioral Approach for Depression With Social Anxiety: Preliminary Results (2014) · cites this paper as Marom, Gilboa-Schechtman, Aderka, Wiezman, & Hermesh, 2009

  • In a 1-year follow-up after treatment termination, patients with SAD and comorbid depression experienced an increase in SAD symptom severity, whereas patients without comorbid depression experienced further alleviation in SAD symptoms.

    “Marom and colleagues (2009) continued to follow patients for 1 year after treatment termination and found that patients with SAD and comorbid depression experienced an increase in SAD symptom severity over the follow-up period, whereas patients without comorbid depression experienced further alleviation in SAD symptoms.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 69 · Cited by 55

Authors
Marom, S., Gilboa-Schechtman, E., Aderka, I. M., Weizman, A., & Hermesh, H.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Marom, Sofi
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2009-03
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
289-300
ISSN
  • 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6394
OpenAlex
W2021391734
Cited by
55
References
69
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, depression, group cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment response, maintenance of treatment gains, major depressive disorder, generalized social phobia, social anxiety, comorbidities, outpatient care
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Phobic Disorders, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Comorbidity, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review