Trait anxiety modulates anterior cingulate activation to threat interference
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Individuals vary in the degree to which salient threatening stimuli disrupt or distract from goal-directed cognitive processes. Excessive attention to threat or difficulty resolving the interference created by threat cues could contribute to anxious psychopathology; disruptions in frontal brain regions implicated in attentional control or resolution of emotional interference (e.g. anterior cingulate cortex, "ACC") might play a role. In this study, we explored the hypothesis that trait anxiety would be associated with ACC activity in an attentional control task with varying levels of threat interference. METHODS: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, 20 healthy individuals who varied in trait anxiety levels viewed angry, fearful, and neutral faces superimposed on an indoor or outdoor scene. In a high-threat interference condition, subjects identified the gender of the face (Attend Face). In a low-threat interference condition, they identified the scene type (Attend Scene). Whole-brain analysis was used to compare Attend Face with Attend Scene for angry and fearful (versus neutral) faces. Contrasts were correlated with trait anxiety level. RESULTS: Behavioral data confirmed that Attend Face produced greater threat interference than Attend Scene. Brain imaging results showed that trait anxiety was inversely associated with bilateral rostral ACC activity for Attend Face relative to Attend Scene for angry faces. A similar relationship was not seen for fearful faces. CONCLUSIONS: The rostral ACC is implicated in assessing the salience of emotional information and controlling attention to resolve emotional interference. The link between higher trait anxiety and decreased ACC activation for angry faces suggests reduced attentional control for signals of interpersonal threat in healthy anxiety-prone individuals.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent findings implicate hypoactivation of the rostral ACC especially in conjunction with the MPFC in emotion regulation deficits in GAD.
“Interestingly, recent findings implicate hypoactivation of the rostral ACC especially in conjunction with the MPFC in emotion regulation deficits in GAD (Klumpp et al., 2011; Mochcovitch et al., 2014).”
From Distinct functional connectivities predict clinical response with emotion regulation therapy (2017) · cites this paper as Klumpp et al., 2011
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports reduced rostral ACC activation with higher trait anxiety during threat interference and suggests diminished attentional control. The study examined healthy anxiety-prone individuals, not people with GAD, and does not establish joint rostral ACC–MPFC hypoactivation or emotion-regulation deficits in GAD. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 56
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [26]First MB Spitzer RL Williams JBW Gibbon M Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Patient Edition (SCID-P) 1995 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC
- Authors
- Klumpp, H., Ho, S. S., Taylor, S. F., Phan, K. L., Abelson, J. L., & Liberzon, I.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Klumpp, Heide
- Venue
- Depression and Anxiety
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 194-201
- ISSN
- 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4376315
- OpenAlex
- W2002520483
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH075999)
- National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024986, UL1RR024)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Keywords
- trait anxiety, anterior cingulate cortex, attentional control, emotional interference, angry faces, fearful faces, emotional salience
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Brain Mapping, Character, Cues, Emotions, Fear, Female, Field Dependence-Independence, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review