Cited by 56Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and Perception

Trait anxiety modulates anterior cingulate activation to threat interference

Open access
Klumpp, Heide, Ho, S. Shaun, Taylor, Stephan F., Phan, K. Luan, Abelson, James L., Liberzon, Israel·2011·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals vary in the degree to which salient threatening stimuli disrupt or distract from goal-directed cognitive processes. Excessive attention to threat or difficulty resolving the interference created by threat cues could contribute to anxious psychopathology; disruptions in frontal brain regions implicated in attentional control or resolution of emotional interference (e.g. anterior cingulate cortex, "ACC") might play a role. In this study, we explored the hypothesis that trait anxiety would be associated with ACC activity in an attentional control task with varying levels of threat interference. METHODS: During functional magnetic resonance imaging, 20 healthy individuals who varied in trait anxiety levels viewed angry, fearful, and neutral faces superimposed on an indoor or outdoor scene. In a high-threat interference condition, subjects identified the gender of the face (Attend Face). In a low-threat interference condition, they identified the scene type (Attend Scene). Whole-brain analysis was used to compare Attend Face with Attend Scene for angry and fearful (versus neutral) faces. Contrasts were correlated with trait anxiety level. RESULTS: Behavioral data confirmed that Attend Face produced greater threat interference than Attend Scene. Brain imaging results showed that trait anxiety was inversely associated with bilateral rostral ACC activity for Attend Face relative to Attend Scene for angry faces. A similar relationship was not seen for fearful faces. CONCLUSIONS: The rostral ACC is implicated in assessing the salience of emotional information and controlling attention to resolve emotional interference. The link between higher trait anxiety and decreased ACC activation for angry faces suggests reduced attentional control for signals of interpersonal threat in healthy anxiety-prone individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.20802

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent findings implicate hypoactivation of the rostral ACC especially in conjunction with the MPFC in emotion regulation deficits in GAD.

    “Interestingly, recent findings implicate hypoactivation of the rostral ACC especially in conjunction with the MPFC in emotion regulation deficits in GAD (Klumpp et al., 2011; Mochcovitch et al., 2014).”

    From Distinct functional connectivities predict clinical response with emotion regulation therapy (2017) · cites this paper as Klumpp et al., 2011

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports reduced rostral ACC activation with higher trait anxiety during threat interference and suggests diminished attentional control. The study examined healthy anxiety-prone individuals, not people with GAD, and does not establish joint rostral ACC–MPFC hypoactivation or emotion-regulation deficits in GAD. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [26]First MB Spitzer RL Williams JBW Gibbon M Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Patient Edition (SCID-P) 1995 American Psychiatric Press Washington, DC

Authors
Klumpp, H., Ho, S. S., Taylor, S. F., Phan, K. L., Abelson, J. L., & Liberzon, I.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Klumpp, Heide
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2011-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
194-201
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002520483
Cited by
56
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 2
FWCI
9.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R24MH075999)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024986, UL1RR024)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
trait anxiety, anterior cingulate cortex, attentional control, emotional interference, angry faces, fearful faces, emotional salience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Brain Mapping, Character, Cues, Emotions, Fear, Female, Field Dependence-Independence, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review