ON HOARDING AND SQUALOR: A FEW CONSIDERATIONS FOR DSM-5: Review: Hoarding And Squalor: Considerations for DSM-5
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hoarding is often framed as an individual behavioural issue resulting from traumatic life experiences, mental health challenges, cognitive impairments, and difficulties with daily activities.
“However, hoarding is often framed as an individual behavioural issue resulting from traumatic life experiences, such as intimate partner violence, childhood abuse, and violent victimization, as well as mental health challenges, cognitive impairments, and difficulties with daily activities [67, 68].”
From Beyond individual factors: a critical ethnographic account of urban residential fire risks, experiences, and responses in single-room occupancy (SRO) housing (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The ‘Overlap Between Squalor and Hoarding’ section says mental disorders and cognitive deficits can contribute to accumulation, while Table 1 describes impaired functioning as a consequence of hoarding symptoms. The paper distinguishes such accumulation from hoarding disorder; it does not support traumatic experiences—including the specified forms of violence and abuse—or difficulties with daily activities as causes of hoarding. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 41
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Dossey L. Syllogomania. Phytomedicine 2005;1(6):415-419.
- Authors
- Snowdon, J., Pertusa, A., & Mataix-Cols, D.
- Affiliations
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- King's College London (GB)
- King's College London; Institute of Psychiatry; London; England
- Corresponding author
- Snowdon, John
- Venue
- Depression and Anxiety
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2012-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 417-424
- ISSN
- 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2142020219
- Cited by
- 41
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- hoarding disorder, squalor, DSM-5, diagnostic criteria, psychiatric classification, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Hoarding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
