THE ENDOCANNABINOID SYSTEM PROVIDES AN AVENUE FOR EVIDENCE-BASED TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT FOR PTSD: The Cutting Edge: Evidence-Based Treatment Developments for PTSD
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The endocannabinoid system is a candidate system for developing novel pharmacotherapies for PTSD.
“highlighting the endocannabinoid system as a candidate system for developing novel pharmacotherapies for PTSD11.”
From Elevated brain cannabinoid CB1 receptor availability in post-traumatic stress disorder: A positron emission tomography study (2013) · cites this paper as [11]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 47
- Authors
- Neumeister, A.
- Affiliations
- NYU Langone Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Neumeister, Alexander
- Venue
- Depression and Anxiety
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2012-12-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-96
- ISSN
- 1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1785586880
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Keywords
- endocannabinoid system, post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD treatment, cannabinoids
- MeSH terms
- Extinction, Psychological, Humans, Memory, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Receptors, Cannabinoid, Drug Discovery, Endocannabinoids
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
