Cited by 107Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Transcranial direct current stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A randomized, controlled, partial crossover trial: D'U rso et al.

Open access
D'Urso, Giordano, Brunoni, Andre R., Mazzaferro, Maria Pia, Anastasia, Annalisa, de Bartolomeis, Andrea, Mantovani, Antonio·2016·Depression and Anxiety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Presupplementary motor area (pre-SMA) hyperactivity has been detected in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients. However, it is not understood whether this is a putative primary cause or a compensatory mechanism in OCD pathophysiology. Considering the polarity-dependent effects on cortical excitability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), we applied cathodal and/or anodal tDCS to the pre-SMA of OCD patients to test which current polarity might better improve symptoms. METHODS: Twelve OCD patients received initially 10 anodal (n = 6) or cathodal (n = 6) daily consecutive 2 mA/20 min tDCS sessions with the active electrode placed bilaterally on the pre-SMA. In case of improvement or no change in symptoms severity, the subjects were maintained on the same current polarity for 10 more sessions. In case of symptoms worsening after the first 10 sessions they were switched to the other polarity for 10 more sessions to test the hypothesis of a polarity-dependent effect. Therefore, each subject received 20 tDCS sessions. The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were administered biweekly to assess changes in symptoms severity. RESULTS: After 10 sessions, 50% of patients who initially received anodal stimulation were switched to cathodal, while 100% of patients initially assigned to cathodal stimulation continued on the same polarity. At the end of the study, a statistically significant decrease was observed in the mean Y-BOCS scores of those patients who underwent cathodal tDCS. No pre-post difference was found in the scores of patients following anodal tDCS. CONCLUSIONS: Cathodal but not anodal tDCS over the pre-SMA significantly improved OCD symptoms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/da.22578

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • tDCS with the cathode over pre-SMA and the anode over an extra-cephalic region has shown some efficacy in reducing OCD symptom severity.

    “Senço et al. [113] proposed using tDCS with the cathode over pre-SMA and anode over an extra-cephalic region, a montage that has shown some efficacy in reducing OCD symptom severity [114].”
  • rTMS and tDCS stimulating dorsal cognitive regions including dlPFC and pre-SMA reduce OCD symptoms, even in treatment-resistant cases.

    “Non-invasive neuromodulatory approaches (rTMS, tDCS) stimulating dorsal cognitive regions including the dlPFC and pre-SMA show efficacy in reducing OCD symptoms [62, 177–179] even in treatment-resistant cases [178–179].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 51 · Cited by 107

Authors
D'Urso, G., Brunoni, A. R., Mazzaferro, M. P., Anastasia, A., de Bartolomeis, A., & Mantovani, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Clinical Neurosciences; Anesthesiology and Pharmacoutilization; University Hospital of Naples Federico II; Naples Italy
  • Interdisciplinary Center for Applied Neuromodulation (CINA); University Hospital; University of São Paulo; São Paulo Brazil
  • University of Naples Federico II (IT)
  • Department of Neurosciences; Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences; University of Naples Federico II; Naples Italy
  • City University of New York (US)
Venue
Depression and Anxiety
Published
2016-11-01
Volume
33
Issue
12
Pages
1132-1140
ISSN
1091-4269 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2547944458
Cited by
107
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
19.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Depression and Anxiety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, obsessive-compulsive disorder, pre-supplementary motor area, cathodal stimulation, anodal stimulation, cortical excitability, symptom severity, Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, Sheehan Disability Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review