The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cytopathological changes in human cervix and endometrium following prolonged retention of copper-bearing intrauterine contraceptive devices
Abstract
Since 1971, cytological evaluation of cervical smears and endometrial aspirates was carried out in 604 women wearing CuT200 intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUDs) for periods ranging from 6 mo to 15 yr. No cases of cervical neoplasia or endometrial carcinoma were encountered, even after continuous use of the device for 15 years. Dysplastic cervical smears were, however, found in 45 postinsertional smears, and endometrial hyperplasia was detected in seven aspirates; in no cases was the dysplasia or hyperplasia higher than of moderate degree. Thirty-nine of the 45 women with postinsertional dysplastic smears were followed for 3-4 yr; in no case did the lesion progress to a higher grade or to frank malignancy. However, persistence and recurrence of dysplasia were seen in 10 women, necessitating removal of the IUDs. The incidence of cervical dysplasia and endometrial hyperplasia was found to be much higher when the IUDs had been changed than when the original devices were worn continuously. The rate of removal of IUDs because of persistent or recurring dysplasia was also much higher in the former group. Since no pregnancies were reported in any of the women wearing the original device for as long as 15 yr, we do not advocate the practice of changing the device at the end of 3 yr for maintaining contraceptive efficacy as recommended by the manufacturers; instead, we recommend the uninterrupted retention of the original device for periods not longer than 5 yr in view of occurrence of endometrial hyperplasia in two 6-yr wearers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Side-effects experienced by users of the CuIUD are a direct result of the copper content of the device.”
From Zinc as a non-hormonal contraceptive: a better alternative to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“This is consistent with the morphological changes observed in human endometrial biopsies taken from women using the CuIUD (13).”
From Zinc as a non-hormonal contraceptive: a better alternative to the copper intrauterine device (IUD) (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Citations
Cites
Dysplasia of the uterine cervix.Incidence of regression, recurrence, and cancer
Stern, E., & Neely, P. M. (1964) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(196404)17:4 · Cited by 67
Cytology of Female Genital Tract
Kokko, U. P. (1973) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-79-6-906 · Cited by 26
Copper loss & cytopathological changes associated with copper IUD use.
Engineer, A. D., Misra, J. S., & Tandon, P. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 4
Self-citationEndometrial cytology associated with intrauterine copper contraception.
Engineer, A. D., Misra, J. S., & Tandon, P. (1983) · PubMed · Cited by 2
Self-citation
Cited by
Roblero, L. S., Guadarrama, A., Lopez, T., & Zegers-Hochschild, F. (1996) · Reproduction Fertility and Development · doi:10.1071/rd9960871 · Cited by 88
Beltrán-García, M. J., Espinosa, A., Herrera, N., Zapata, A. J. P., Beltran-García, C., & Ogura, T. (2000) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/s0010-7824(00)00085-8 · Cited by 52
Luthra, U. K., Mehta, S., Bhargava, N. C., Ramachandran, P., Murthy, N. S., Sehgal, A., & Saxena, B. N. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0691-5_14 · Cited by 28
Zinc as a non-hormonal contraceptive: an alternative to the copper intrauterine device (IUD)
Shankie-williams, K. N., Lindsay, L. A., Murphy, C. R., & Dowland, S. N. (2022) · Reproduction · doi:10.1530/rep-22-0155 · Cited by 9
Cervical carcinogenesis and contraception
Misra, J. S., Engineer, A. D., Das, K., & Tandon, P. (1991) · Diagnostic Cytopathology · doi:10.1002/dc.2840070405 · Cited by 6
Self-citationZinc as a non-hormonal contraceptive: a better alternative to the copper intrauterine device (IUD)
Shankie-Williams, K., Lindsay, L., Murphy, C., & Dowland, S. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.24.485705 · Cited by 3
Ganacharya, S., Bhattoa, H. P., & Batár, I. (2006) · The European Journal of Contraception & Reproductive Health Care · doi:10.1080/13625180500539513 · Cited by 3
Damodaran, S., & Swaminathan, K. (2013) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-416045-3.00006-6 · Cited by 1
Damodaran, S., & Swaminathan, K. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817919-2.00005-x
Metadata
- Authors
- Misra, J. S., Engineer, A. D., & Tandon, P.
- Affiliations
- King George's Medical University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Misra, Jata S.
- ORCID
- Misra, Jata S.
- Venue
- Diagnostic Cytopathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-07
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237-242
- ISSN
- 1097-0339 (ISSN-L)
- 8755-1039
- OpenAlex
- W2108541172
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diagnostic Cytopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Queen Mary University of London
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
- Keywords
- cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, endometrial hyperplasia, cervical neoplasia, endometrial cancer, cervical cytology, long-term IUD use
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Cervix Uteri, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Intrauterine Devices, Copper, Vaginal Smears
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
