Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pharmacokinetic actions of exendin‐4 in the rat: Comparison with glucagon‐like peptide‐1

Parkes, David, Jodka, Carolyn, Smith, Pam, Nayak, Sonali, Rinehart, Liz, Gingerich, Ron, Chen, Kim, Young, Andrew·2001·Drug Development Research

Abstract

Exendin‐4, originally isolated from saliva of the lizard Heloderma suspectum, shares 53% sequence homology and several potentially antidiabetic actions with the mammalian hormone glucagon‐like peptide‐1(7‐36)amide (GLP‐1). It shows a higher potency and longer duration of effect in vivo, which may be partly attributed to pharmacokinetic properties. The present study compares the pharmacokinetics of GLP‐1 and exendin‐4 in rats after intravenous (iv), subcutaneous (sc), or intraperitoneal (ip) administration. Samples were assayed for active GLP‐1 (7‐36) amide using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay that does not detect GLP‐1 (1‐36‐amide), (1‐37), (9‐36‐amide) or (9‐37). In parallel experiments, samples were assayed for exendin‐4 using a two‐site immunoradiometric assay that reacts specifically with full‐length exendin‐4. The estimated half‐life for GLP‐1 and exendin‐4 were 0.8–4.7 min and 18–41 min for iv bolus, and 4.6–7.1 min and 90–216 min for SC administration, respectively. Half‐lives after ip injection were 0.6–13.5 min for GLP‐1 and 125–174 min for exendin‐4. Bioavailability for GLP‐1 and exendin‐4 was 44–71% and 65–75%, respectively, for sc injection. For ip injection, bioavailability for GLP‐1 and exendin‐4 was 36–67% and 74–76%, respectively. Plasma clearance, as determined from iv infusion data, was 35–38 ml/min for GLP‐1 and 4‐8 ml/min for exendin‐4. Both Co/C max and AUC values were proportional to dose with each route of administration. Plasma clearance of exendin‐4 was reduced by 4.4‐fold in nephrectomized animals. In conclusion, exendin‐4 exhibited a much longer plasma half‐life than GLP‐1 in rats after iv, sc, or ip injection, which may contribute in some part to reported differences in duration of biological action of the two peptides. Drug Dev. Res. 53:260–267, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ddr.1195

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Parkes, D., Jodka, C., Smith, P., Nayak, S., Rinehart, L., Gingerich, R., Chen, K., & Young, A.
Venue
Drug Development Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-08
Volume
53
Issue
4
Pages
260-267
ISSN
  • 0272-4391 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2299
OpenAlex
W1993072922
Cited by
158
References
3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pharmacokinetic actions of exendin‐4 in the rat: Comparison with glucagon‐like peptide‐1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ddr.1195
The paper
Parkes, D., Jodka, C., Smith, P., Nayak, S., Rinehart, L., Gingerich, R., Chen, K., & Young, A. (2001). Pharmacokinetic actions of exendin‐4 in the rat: Comparison with glucagon‐like peptide‐1. Drug Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.1195

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.