The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of the proteolytic susceptibilities of homologous L‐amino acid, D‐amino acid, and N‐substituted glycine peptide and peptoid oligomers
Abstract
A series of homologous L‐amino acid, D‐amino acid, and both parallel and anti‐parallel (retro) sequence N‐substituted glycine peptide and peptoid oligomers were prepared and incubated with a series of enzymes representative of the major classes of proteases. Each respective L‐amino acid containing peptide sequence was readily cleaved by the appropriate enzyme, namely Ac‐L‐ala‐L‐leu‐L‐phe‐L‐ala‐L‐leu‐L‐arg‐NH 2 by chymotrypsin, Ac‐L‐ala‐L‐ala‐L‐ala‐L‐leu‐L‐phe‐L‐arg‐NH 2 by elastase, Ac‐L‐ala‐L‐phe‐L‐glu‐L‐leu‐L‐ala‐L‐ala‐NH 2 by papain, Z‐L‐ala‐L‐his‐L‐phe‐L‐phe‐L‐arg‐L‐leu‐NH 2 by pepsin, Ac‐L‐phe‐L‐ala‐L‐arg‐L‐ala‐L‐arg‐L‐asp‐NH 2 by trypsin, and Ac‐L‐ala‐L‐tyr‐Lala‐L‐phe‐OH for carboxypeptidase A. In contrast, equivalent D‐amino acid containing and N‐substituted glycine containing oligomers were cleaved minimally or not at all by the respective enzymes. The N‐substituted glycine peptoids represent a new class of combinatorial diversity for lead discovery with improved pharmaceutical characteristics relative to L‐amino acid containing peptides. © 1995 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Synthesis and Applications of Small Molecule Libraries
Thompson, L. A., & Ellman, J. A. (1996) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9402081 · Cited by 1,452
Recent approaches in designing bioadhesive materials inspired by mussel adhesive protein
Kord Forooshani, P., & Lee, B. P. (2017) · Journal of Polymer Science Part A: Polymer Chemistry · doi:10.1002/pola.28368 · Cited by 632
Helical Peptoid Mimics of Magainin-2 Amide
Patch, J. A., & Barron, A. E. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja037320d · Cited by 375
Surface-grafted polysarcosine as a peptoid antifouling polymer brush
Lau, K. H. A., Ren, C., Sileika, T. S., Park, S. H., Szleifer, I., & Messersmith, P. B. (2012) · Langmuir · doi:10.1021/la302131n · Cited by 178
Peptides As Therapeutics with Enhanced Bioactivity
Goodwin, D., Simerska, P., & Toth, I. (2012) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986712803251548 · Cited by 176
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, S. M., Simon, R. J., Ng, S., Zuckermann, R. N., Kerr, J. M., & Moos, W. H.
- Venue
- Drug Development Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-32
- ISSN
- 0272-4391 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2299
- OpenAlex
- W2014516639
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the proteolytic susceptibilities of homologous L‐amino acid, D‐amino acid, and N‐substituted glycine peptide and peptoid oligomers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/ddr.430350105
- The paper
- Miller, S. M., Simon, R. J., Ng, S., Zuckermann, R. N., Kerr, J. M., & Moos, W. H. (1995). Comparison of the proteolytic susceptibilities of homologous L‐amino acid, D‐amino acid, and N‐substituted glycine peptide and peptoid oligomers. Drug Development Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/ddr.430350105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.