Accelerated nervous system development contributes to behavioral efficiency in the laboratory mouse: A behavioral review and theoretical proposal
Abstract
The emergence of the laboratory mouse as a favored species for genetic research has posed a number of problems for scientists interested in the reflection of genetic influences in mouse behavior. It is commonly thought that rat behavior, which has been studied more extensively than mouse behavior, could be easily generalized to mice. In this article, a number of categories of behavior displayed by the mouse (motor, spatial, defensive, social) are reviewed and contrasted with the same categories of behavior displayed by the rat. The comparison suggests that mouse behavior is simpler and more dependent upon elementary actions than the behavior of the rat. We suggest that the behavioral simplification in the mouse adapts it for a different ecological niche than that occupied by the rat. We propose that this simplification may be mediated by accelerated brain maturation during development. We further propose that this developmental acceleration in the mouse renders it less dependent upon complex social behavior and plastic nervous system changes associated with learning than the rat. This difference poses problems for the development of relevant methods of behavioral analysis and interpretation. Since the mouse's biological adaptations will be reflected in laboratory behavior, suggestions are made for behavioral approaches to the study and interpretation of mouse behavior. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 39: 151–170, 2001
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rats are preferred for behavioral, memory, and cognitive research due to their physiological similarities to humans and their high learning capacity.
“Rats are preferred for behavioral, memory, and cognitive research due to their physiological similarities to humans and their high learning capacity [17–20].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 127 · Cited by 110
- Authors
- Whishaw, I. Q., Metz, G. A. S., Kolb, B., & Pellis, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Whishaw, Ian Q.
- Venue
- Developmental Psychobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10-29
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-170
- ISSN
- 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-2302
- OpenAlex
- W2121370796
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Keywords
- brain development, motor behavior, spatial behavior, defensive behavior, social behavior, ecological niche, behavioral genetics
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Male, Models, Genetic, Species Specificity, Mice, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review