Cited by 110Animal Behavior and ReproductionPrimate Behavior and EcologyMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Accelerated nervous system development contributes to behavioral efficiency in the laboratory mouse: A behavioral review and theoretical proposal

Whishaw, Ian Q., Metz, Gerlinde A. S., Kolb, Bryan, Pellis, Sergio M.·2001·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

The emergence of the laboratory mouse as a favored species for genetic research has posed a number of problems for scientists interested in the reflection of genetic influences in mouse behavior. It is commonly thought that rat behavior, which has been studied more extensively than mouse behavior, could be easily generalized to mice. In this article, a number of categories of behavior displayed by the mouse (motor, spatial, defensive, social) are reviewed and contrasted with the same categories of behavior displayed by the rat. The comparison suggests that mouse behavior is simpler and more dependent upon elementary actions than the behavior of the rat. We suggest that the behavioral simplification in the mouse adapts it for a different ecological niche than that occupied by the rat. We propose that this simplification may be mediated by accelerated brain maturation during development. We further propose that this developmental acceleration in the mouse renders it less dependent upon complex social behavior and plastic nervous system changes associated with learning than the rat. This difference poses problems for the development of relevant methods of behavioral analysis and interpretation. Since the mouse's biological adaptations will be reflected in laboratory behavior, suggestions are made for behavioral approaches to the study and interpretation of mouse behavior. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Dev Psychobiol 39: 151–170, 2001

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.1041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 127 · Cited by 110

Authors
Whishaw, I. Q., Metz, G. A. S., Kolb, B., & Pellis, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Lethbridge (CA)
Corresponding author
Whishaw, Ian Q.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-10-29
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
151-170
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W2121370796
Cited by
110
References
127
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
brain development, motor behavior, spatial behavior, defensive behavior, social behavior, ecological niche, behavioral genetics
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Genetics, Behavioral, Male, Models, Genetic, Species Specificity, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review